Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
371 kcal
Score
41 / 100
Amarant Tohumu has a higher nutrition quality score (41) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
387 vs 371(-4.1%)
Score Diff
23 vs 41(+78.3%)
OVERALL WINNER
Amarant Tohumu
Higher energy
Mısır patlağı
Score leader
Amarant Tohumu
Nutrient split
6 - 15 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Mısır patlağı and Amarant Tohumu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Mısır patlağı has 387.0 kcal and Amarant Tohumu has 371.0 kcal. The difference is 16.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 23 and 41. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
21 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Mısır patlağı | Amarant Tohumu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 10 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.157 mg | 0.12 mg | -23.6% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.083 mg | 0.2 mg | +141.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.157 mg | 0.59 mg | +275.8% |
| Bakir | 0.262 mg | 0.53 mg | +102.3% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 4.2 mg | — |
| Demir | 3.19 mg | 7.61 mg | +138.6% |
| Diyet lifi | 14.5 g | 6.7 g | -53.8% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 0.29 mg | 1.19 mg | +310.3% |
| Folat DFE | 31 µg | 82 µg | +164.5% |
| Fosfor | 358 mg | 557 mg | +55.6% |
| Kalsiyum | — | 159 mg | — |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 77.78 g | 65.25 g | -16.1% |
| Kül | 1.42 g | 2.88 g | +102.8% |
| Lizin | — | 0.75 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 144 mg | 248 mg | +72.2% |
| Mangan | 1.12 mg | 3.33 mg | +197.3% |
| Niasin | 2.308 mg | 0.92 mg | -60.1% |
| Pantotenik asit | — | 1.46 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 329 mg | 508 mg | +54.4% |
| Protein | 12.94 g | 13.56 g | +4.8% |
| Selenyum | 7.3 µg | 18.7 µg | +156.2% |
| Sodyum | 8 mg | 4 mg | -50.0% |
| Su | 3.32 g | 11.29 g | +240.1% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 1.46 g | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 1.69 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 4.54 g | 7.02 g | +54.6% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 2.78 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 1.69 g | — |
| Çinko | 3.08 mg | 2.87 mg | -6.8% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Mısır patlağı and Amarant Tohumu.
Amarant Tohumu has less energy per 100 g (371 kcal versus 387 kcal).
For measured E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol), Mısır patlağı has 0.29 mg and Amarant Tohumu has 1.19 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Mısır patlağı 23, Amarant Tohumu 41.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.