Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Mihaliç Peyniri (Kelle) has a higher nutrition quality score (33) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
381.7 vs 292(-23.5%)
Score Diff
33 vs 32(-3.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Mihaliç Peyniri (Kelle)
Higher energy
Mihaliç Peyniri (Kelle)
Score leader
Mihaliç Peyniri (Kelle)
Nutrient split
16 - 3 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Mihaliç Peyniri (Kelle) and Antep peyniri are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Mihaliç Peyniri (Kelle) has 381.7 kcal and Antep peyniri has 292.0 kcal. The difference is 89.7 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 33 and 32. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Mihaliç Peyniri (Kelle) | Antep peyniri | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 275 µg | 195 µg | -29.1% |
| B12 Vitamini | 1.85 µg | 1.45 µg | -21.6% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.42 mg | 0.36 mg | -14.3% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.09 mg | — | — |
| D Vitamini | 0.6 µg | — | — |
| Demir | 0.45 mg | 0.42 mg | -6.7% |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Enerji | — | 1221 kj | — |
| Fosfor | 535 mg | 450 mg | -15.9% |
| Kalsiyum | 780 mg | 680 mg | -12.8% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 1.6 g | 1.8 g | +12.5% |
| Kolesterol | 88 mg | 72 mg | -18.2% |
| Kül | 3.9 g | 6.7 g | +71.8% |
| Laktoz | — | 1.2 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 34 mg | 25 mg | -26.5% |
| Potasyum | 125 mg | 115 mg | -8.0% |
| Protein | 25.2 g | 21.5 g | -14.7% |
| Retinol | — | 190 µg | — |
| Sodyum | 1520 mg | 1250 mg | -17.8% |
| Su | 38.8 g | 48 g | +23.7% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 19.4 g | 13.8 g | -28.9% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 7.8 g | 5.8 g | -25.6% |
| Toplam yağ | 30.5 g | 22 g | -27.9% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.1 g | 0.85 g | -22.7% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 1.2 g | — |
| Çinko | 3.8 mg | 3.2 mg | -15.8% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Mihaliç Peyniri (Kelle) and Antep peyniri.
Antep peyniri has less energy per 100 g (292 kcal versus 381.7 kcal).
For measured Kül, Mihaliç Peyniri (Kelle) has 3.9 g and Antep peyniri has 6.7 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Mihaliç Peyniri (Kelle) 33, Antep peyniri 32.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.