Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
324.2 kcal
Score
55 / 100
Meksika kekik has a higher nutrition quality score (83) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
265 vs 324.2(+22.3%)
Score Diff
83 vs 55(-33.7%)
OVERALL WINNER
Meksika kekik
Higher energy
Amchur
Score leader
Meksika kekik
Nutrient split
17 - 4 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Meksika kekik and Amchur are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Meksika kekik has 265.0 kcal and Amchur has 324.2 kcal. The difference is 59.2 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 83 and 55. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
21 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Meksika kekik | Amchur | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 22 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.17 mg | 0.08 mg | -52.9% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.53 mg | 0.09 mg | -83.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 1.04 mg | 0.22 mg | -78.8% |
| Bakir | 0.6 mg | 0.35 mg | -41.7% |
| Beta Karoten | — | 260 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 50 mg | 52 mg | +4.0% |
| Demir | 36.8 mg | 24.5 mg | -33.4% |
| Diyet lifi | 42.8 g | 12.8 g | -70.1% |
| Folat DFE | 237 µg | 28 µg | -88.2% |
| Fosfor | 148 mg | 75 mg | -49.3% |
| Kalsiyum | 1597 mg | 180 mg | -88.7% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 68.9 g | 80.2 g | +16.4% |
| Kül | 8 g | 5.3 g | -33.8% |
| Magnezyum | 270 mg | 82 mg | -69.6% |
| Mangan | 5 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | 4.6 mg | 1.4 mg | -69.6% |
| Potasyum | 1260 mg | 640 mg | -49.2% |
| Protein | 9 g | 3.2 g | -64.4% |
| Sodyum | 25 mg | 35 mg | +40.0% |
| Su | 9.9 g | 9.5 g | -4.0% |
| Toplam yağ | 4.3 g | 1.8 g | -58.1% |
| Toplam Şeker | 4.1 g | 21.4 g | +422.0% |
| Çinko | 2.7 mg | 1.1 mg | -59.3% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Meksika kekik and Amchur.
Meksika kekik has less energy per 100 g (265 kcal versus 324.2 kcal).
For measured Toplam Şeker, Meksika kekik has 4.1 g and Amchur has 21.4 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Meksika kekik 83, Amchur 55.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.