Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
32 kcal
Score
47 / 100
Yeşil papaya has a higher nutrition quality score (47) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
295 vs 32(-89.1%)
Score Diff
9 vs 47(+422.2%)
OVERALL WINNER
Yeşil papaya
Higher energy
Mastic sakızı
Score leader
Yeşil papaya
Nutrient split
10 - 3 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Mastic sakızı and Yeşil papaya are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Mastic sakızı has 295.0 kcal and Yeşil papaya has 32.0 kcal. The difference is 263.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 9 and 47. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
13 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Mastic sakızı | Yeşil papaya | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 24 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.02 mg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.03 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0.03 mg | — |
| Bakir | 0.22 mg | — | — |
| Beta Karoten | — | 274 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 60.9 mg | — |
| Demir | 1.9 mg | 0.25 mg | -86.8% |
| Diyet lifi | 78.5 g | 1.8 g | -97.7% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 1.2 mg | — | — |
| Enerji | 1234 kj | — | — |
| Fitosteroller | 45 mg | — | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 38 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 22 mg | 5 mg | -77.3% |
| Kalsiyum | 65 mg | 24 mg | -63.1% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 84.2 g | 8.8 g | -89.5% |
| Kül | 0.7 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 18 mg | 10 mg | -44.4% |
| Mangan | 0.45 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | — | 0.35 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 95 mg | 180 mg | +89.5% |
| Protein | 1.1 g | 0.6 g | -45.5% |
| Sodyum | 12 mg | 3 mg | -75.0% |
| Su | 2.2 g | 91.5 g | +4059.1% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.4 g | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.8 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 1.8 g | 0.1 g | -94.4% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.3 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 0.4 g | 5 g | +1150.0% |
| Çinko | 0.85 mg | 0.07 mg | -91.8% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Mastic sakızı and Yeşil papaya.
Yeşil papaya has less energy per 100 g (32 kcal versus 295 kcal).
For measured Su, Mastic sakızı has 2.2 g and Yeşil papaya has 91.5 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Mastic sakızı 9, Yeşil papaya 47.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.