Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
277 kcal
Score
14 / 100
Marula has a higher nutrition quality score (48) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
58 vs 277(+377.6%)
Score Diff
48 vs 14(-70.8%)
OVERALL WINNER
Marula
Higher energy
Acve Hurması
Score leader
Marula
Nutrient split
3 - 15 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Marula and Acve Hurması are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Marula has 58.0 kcal and Acve Hurması has 277.0 kcal. The difference is 219.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 48 and 14. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Marula | Acve Hurması | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.03 mg | 0.05 mg | +66.7% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.04 mg | 0.06 mg | +50.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0.25 mg | — |
| Bakir | 0.08 mg | 0.36 mg | +350.0% |
| Beta Karoten | 35 µg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 194 mg | 0.4 mg | -99.8% |
| Demir | 0.4 mg | 1 mg | +150.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 2.1 g | 7 g | +233.3% |
| Fosfor | 20 mg | 62 mg | +210.0% |
| Fruktoz | — | 31.5 g | — |
| Glikoz | — | 31.8 g | — |
| Kalsiyum | 12 mg | 64 mg | +433.3% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 13.7 g | 75 g | +447.4% |
| Kül | 0.6 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 25 mg | 54 mg | +116.0% |
| Mangan | — | 0.26 mg | — |
| Niasin | 0.22 mg | 1.6 mg | +627.3% |
| Potasyum | 310 mg | 656 mg | +111.6% |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 2.5 g | +400.0% |
| Sodyum | 4 mg | 1 mg | -75.0% |
| Su | 85 g | 21.3 g | -74.9% |
| Toplam yağ | 0.2 g | 0.4 g | +100.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | 9.2 g | 63.3 g | +588.0% |
| Çinko | 0.12 mg | 0.44 mg | +266.7% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Marula and Acve Hurması.
Marula has less energy per 100 g (58 kcal versus 277 kcal).
For measured Niasin, Marula has 0.22 mg and Acve Hurması has 1.6 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Marula 48, Acve Hurması 14.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.