Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
304 kcal
Score
2 / 100
Marinara sosu has a higher nutrition quality score (46) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
51 vs 304(+496.1%)
Score Diff
46 vs 2(-95.7%)
OVERALL WINNER
Marinara sosu
Higher energy
Akasya Balı
Score leader
Marinara sosu
Nutrient split
13 - 2 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Marinara sosu and Akasya Balı are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Marinara sosu has 51.0 kcal and Akasya Balı has 304.0 kcal. The difference is 253.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 46 and 2. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
15 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Marinara sosu | Akasya Balı | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 20 µg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.038 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0.024 mg | — |
| Bakir | — | 0.036 mg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 6.5 mg | 0.5 mg | -92.3% |
| Demir | 0.8 mg | 0.42 mg | -47.5% |
| Diyet lifi | 1.9 g | 0.2 g | -89.5% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 1.4 mg | — | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 2 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 28 mg | 4 mg | -85.7% |
| Fruktoz | — | 43.5 g | — |
| Glikoz | — | 29.8 g | — |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 9.5 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 18 mg | 6 mg | -66.7% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 7.3 g | 82.4 g | +1028.8% |
| Kül | — | 0.2 g | — |
| Likopen | 8500 µg | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 16 mg | 2 mg | -87.5% |
| Maltoz | — | 2.1 g | — |
| Mangan | — | 0.08 mg | — |
| Niasin | 1.1 mg | 0.12 mg | -89.1% |
| Potasyum | 330 mg | 52 mg | -84.2% |
| Protein | 1.4 g | 0.3 g | -78.6% |
| Sakkaroz | — | 1.9 g | — |
| Selenyum | — | 0.8 µg | — |
| Sodyum | 430 mg | 4 mg | -99.1% |
| Su | 88.5 g | 17.1 g | -80.7% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.26 g | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.15 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 1.8 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.31 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 4.6 g | 82.1 g | +1684.8% |
| Çinko | 0.25 mg | 0.22 mg | -12.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Marinara sosu and Akasya Balı.
Marinara sosu has less energy per 100 g (51 kcal versus 304 kcal).
For measured Toplam Şeker, Marinara sosu has 4.6 g and Akasya Balı has 82.1 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Marinara sosu 46, Akasya Balı 2.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.