Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Maraş Biberi (İpek Pul Biber) has a higher nutrition quality score (75) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
318 vs 324.2(+1.9%)
Score Diff
75 vs 55(-26.7%)
OVERALL WINNER
Maraş Biberi (İpek Pul Biber)
Higher energy
Amchur
Score leader
Maraş Biberi (İpek Pul Biber)
Nutrient split
18 - 3 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Maraş Biberi (İpek Pul Biber) and Amchur are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Maraş Biberi (İpek Pul Biber) has 318.0 kcal and Amchur has 324.2 kcal. The difference is 6.2 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 75 and 55. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
22 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Maraş Biberi (İpek Pul Biber) | Amchur | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 2160 µg | 22 µg | -99.0% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.33 mg | 0.08 mg | -75.8% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.92 mg | 0.09 mg | -90.2% |
| B6 Vitamini | 2.1 mg | 0.22 mg | -89.5% |
| Bakir | — | 0.35 mg | — |
| Beta Karoten | 25900 µg | 260 µg | -99.0% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 76.4 mg | 52 mg | -31.9% |
| Demir | 17.3 mg | 24.5 mg | +41.6% |
| Diyet lifi | 27.2 g | 12.8 g | -52.9% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 29.8 mg | — | — |
| Folat DFE | 51 µg | 28 µg | -45.1% |
| Fosfor | 293 mg | 75 mg | -74.4% |
| Kalsiyum | 330 mg | 180 mg | -45.5% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 53.8 g | 80.2 g | +49.1% |
| Kül | 6.5 g | 5.3 g | -18.5% |
| Magnezyum | 152 mg | 82 mg | -46.1% |
| Niasin | 8.7 mg | 1.4 mg | -83.9% |
| Potasyum | 2014 mg | 640 mg | -68.2% |
| Protein | 12 g | 3.2 g | -73.3% |
| Sodyum | 1250 mg | 35 mg | -97.2% |
| Su | 9.5 g | 9.5 g | 0.0% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 2.45 g | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 2.12 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 14.2 g | 1.8 g | -87.3% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 7.45 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 10.3 g | 21.4 g | +107.8% |
| Çinko | 2.68 mg | 1.1 mg | -59.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Maraş Biberi (İpek Pul Biber) and Amchur.
Maraş Biberi (İpek Pul Biber) has less energy per 100 g (318 kcal versus 324.2 kcal).
For measured Toplam Şeker, Maraş Biberi (İpek Pul Biber) has 10.3 g and Amchur has 21.4 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Maraş Biberi (İpek Pul Biber) 75, Amchur 55.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.