Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
81 kcal
Score
62 / 100
Araka has a higher nutrition quality score (62) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
74 vs 81(+9.5%)
Score Diff
59 vs 62(+5.1%)
OVERALL WINNER
Araka
Higher energy
Araka
Score leader
Araka
Nutrient split
7 - 12 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Lotus sapı and Araka are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Lotus sapı has 74.0 kcal and Araka has 81.0 kcal. The difference is 7.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 59 and 62. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Lotus sapı | Araka | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 38 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.16 mg | 0.266 mg | +66.3% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.022 mg | 0.132 mg | +500.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.258 mg | 0.169 mg | -34.5% |
| Bakir | 0.257 mg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 44 mg | 40 mg | -9.1% |
| Demir | 1.16 mg | 1.47 mg | +26.7% |
| Diyet lifi | 4.9 g | 5.7 g | +16.3% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 0.13 mg | — |
| Fosfor | 100 mg | 108 mg | +8.0% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 24.8 µg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 45 mg | 25 mg | -44.4% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 17.23 g | 14.45 g | -16.1% |
| Kül | 0.97 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 23 mg | 33 mg | +43.5% |
| Mangan | 0.261 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | 0.4 mg | 2.09 mg | +422.5% |
| Pantotenik asit | 0.377 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 556 mg | 244 mg | -56.1% |
| Protein | 2.6 g | 5.42 g | +108.5% |
| Selenyum | 0.7 µg | — | — |
| Sodyum | 40 mg | 5 mg | -87.5% |
| Su | 79.1 g | 78.86 g | -0.3% |
| Toplam Folat | 13 µg | 65 µg | +400.0% |
| Toplam Kolin | 25.4 mg | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.1 g | 0.4 g | +300.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | 0.5 g | 5.67 g | +1034.0% |
| Çinko | 0.39 mg | 1.24 mg | +217.9% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Lotus sapı and Araka.
Lotus sapı has less energy per 100 g (74 kcal versus 81 kcal).
For measured Toplam Şeker, Lotus sapı has 0.5 g and Araka has 5.67 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Lotus sapı 59, Araka 62.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.