Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
292 kcal
Score
32 / 100
Antep peyniri has a higher nutrition quality score (32) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
102 vs 292(+186.3%)
Score Diff
31 vs 32(+3.2%)
OVERALL WINNER
Antep peyniri
Higher energy
Antep peyniri
Score leader
Antep peyniri
Nutrient split
5 - 16 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Lor Peyniri (Tatlı) and Antep peyniri are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Lor Peyniri (Tatlı) has 102.0 kcal and Antep peyniri has 292.0 kcal. The difference is 190.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 31 and 32. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
22 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Lor Peyniri (Tatlı) | Antep peyniri | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 35 µg | 195 µg | +457.1% |
| B12 Vitamini | 0.35 µg | 1.45 µg | +314.3% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.2 mg | 0.36 mg | +80.0% |
| Demir | 0.2 mg | 0.42 mg | +110.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Enerji | — | 1221 kj | — |
| Fosfor | 160 mg | 450 mg | +181.3% |
| Kalsiyum | 206 mg | 680 mg | +230.1% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 3.7 g | 1.8 g | -51.4% |
| Kolesterol | 15 mg | 72 mg | +380.0% |
| Kül | 1.1 g | 6.7 g | +509.1% |
| Laktoz | 3.5 g | 1.2 g | -65.7% |
| Magnezyum | 11 mg | 25 mg | +127.3% |
| Potasyum | 125 mg | 115 mg | -8.0% |
| Protein | 12.3 g | 21.5 g | +74.8% |
| Retinol | — | 190 µg | — |
| Sodyum | 48 mg | 1250 mg | +2504.2% |
| Su | 78.1 g | 48 g | -38.5% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 2.4 g | 13.8 g | +475.0% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 1 g | 5.8 g | +480.0% |
| Toplam yağ | 3.8 g | 22 g | +478.9% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.15 g | 0.85 g | +466.7% |
| Toplam Şeker | 3.5 g | 1.2 g | -65.7% |
| Çinko | 1.1 mg | 3.2 mg | +190.9% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Lor Peyniri (Tatlı) and Antep peyniri.
Lor Peyniri (Tatlı) has less energy per 100 g (102 kcal versus 292 kcal).
For measured Sodyum, Lor Peyniri (Tatlı) has 48 mg and Antep peyniri has 1250 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Lor Peyniri (Tatlı) 31, Antep peyniri 32.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.