Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
170 kcal
Score
52 / 100
Ahtapot Salata, Porto Riko usulü has a higher nutrition quality score (52) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
140 vs 170(+21.4%)
Score Diff
46 vs 52(+13.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Ahtapot Salata, Porto Riko usulü
Higher energy
Ahtapot Salata, Porto Riko usulü
Score leader
Ahtapot Salata, Porto Riko usulü
Nutrient split
23 - 31 (tie: 11)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Lau Lau and Ahtapot Salata, Porto Riko usulü are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Lau Lau has 140.0 kcal and Ahtapot Salata, Porto Riko usulü has 170.0 kcal. The difference is 30.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 46 and 52. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
65 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Lau Lau | Ahtapot Salata, Porto Riko usulü | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 5 µg | 38 µg | +660.0% |
| Alfa Karoten | 0 µg | 33 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.18 mg | 0.04 mg | -77.8% |
| B12 Vitamini | 0.78 µg | 9.69 µg | +1142.3% |
| B12 Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.12 mg | 0.04 mg | -66.7% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.21 mg | 0.24 mg | +14.3% |
| Bakir | 0.04 mg | 0.28 mg | +600.0% |
| Besin folati | 3 µg | 18 µg | +500.0% |
| Beta Karoten | 0 µg | 149 µg | — |
| Beta kriptoksantin | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 0.1 mg | 8.9 mg | +8800.0% |
| D Vitamini | 1.7 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| Demir | 0.52 mg | 3.3 mg | +534.6% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 0.05 g | 0.05 g | 0.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | 1 g | — |
| DPA (22:5 n-3) | 0.01 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 0.37 mg | 3.26 mg | +781.1% |
| E Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Enerji | 140 kj | 170 kj | +21.4% |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0.07 g | 0.05 g | -28.6% |
| Etil alkol | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Folat DFE | 3 µg | 18 µg | +500.0% |
| Folik asit | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 197 mg | 107 mg | -45.7% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 0 µg | 6.1 µg | — |
| Kafein | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 14 mg | 44 mg | +214.3% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 0 g | 5.56 g | — |
| Kolesterol | 57 mg | 29 mg | -49.1% |
| Likopen | 0 µg | 845 µg | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 0 µg | 43 µg | — |
| Magnezyum | 18 mg | 24 mg | +33.3% |
| MUFA 16:1 | 0.23 g | 0.16 g | -30.4% |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 3.08 g | 7.57 g | +145.8% |
| MUFA 20:1 | 0.08 g | 0.05 g | -37.5% |
| MUFA 22:1 | 0 g | 0.01 g | — |
| Niasin | 2.73 mg | 1.25 mg | -54.2% |
| Potasyum | 223 mg | 297 mg | +33.2% |
| Protein | 15.25 g | 9.67 g | -36.6% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | 0.77 g | 1.03 g | +33.8% |
| PUFA 18:3 | 0.05 g | 0.07 g | +40.0% |
| PUFA 18:4 | 0.01 g | 0.02 g | +100.0% |
| PUFA 20:4 (arasidonik asit) | 0.07 g | 0.03 g | -57.1% |
| Retinol | 5 µg | 25 µg | +400.0% |
| Selenyum | 27.4 µg | 27.3 µg | -0.4% |
| SFA 10:0 | 0.01 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| SFA 12:0 | 0.01 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| SFA 14:0 | 0.13 g | 0.02 g | -84.6% |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | 1.7 g | 1.48 g | -12.9% |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | 0.87 g | 0.33 g | -62.1% |
| SFA 4:0 (butirik asit) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 6:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 8:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Sodyum | 231 mg | 129 mg | -44.2% |
| Su | 74.98 g | 71.33 g | -4.9% |
| Teobromin | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 2.67 g | 1.9 g | -28.8% |
| Toplam Folat | 3 µg | 18 µg | +500.0% |
| Toplam Kolin | 47.9 mg | 43.4 mg | -9.4% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 3.3 g | 7.79 g | +136.1% |
| Toplam yağ | 8.32 g | 11.95 g | +43.6% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.04 g | 1.24 g | +19.2% |
| Toplam Şeker | 0 g | 2.13 g | — |
| Çinko | 1.26 mg | 1.13 mg | -10.3% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Lau Lau and Ahtapot Salata, Porto Riko usulü.
Lau Lau has less energy per 100 g (140 kcal versus 170 kcal).
For measured C Vitamini (askorbik asit), Lau Lau has 0.1 mg and Ahtapot Salata, Porto Riko usulü has 8.9 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Lau Lau 46, Ahtapot Salata, Porto Riko usulü 52.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.