Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
157 kcal
Score
47 / 100
Applebee'S, Biber has a higher nutrition quality score (47) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
231 vs 157(-32.0%)
Score Diff
29 vs 47(+62.1%)
OVERALL WINNER
Applebee'S, Biber
Higher energy
Lahmacun
Score leader
Applebee'S, Biber
Nutrient split
9 - 10 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Lahmacun and Applebee'S, Biber are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Lahmacun has 231.0 kcal and Applebee'S, Biber has 157.0 kcal. The difference is 74.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 29 and 47. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Lahmacun | Applebee'S, Biber | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (IU) | — | 1436 iu | — |
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 45 µg | 149 µg | +231.1% |
| ALA (18:3 n-3) | — | 0.04 g | — |
| Alanin | — | 0.79 g | — |
| Alfa Karoten | — | 0 µg | — |
| Alfa tokotrienol | — | 0.02 mg | — |
| Arjinin | — | 0.77 g | — |
| Aspartik asit | — | 1.2 g | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.04 mg | — |
| B12 Vitamini | 0.6 µg | 1.26 µg | +110.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.21 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.15 mg | 0.32 mg | +113.3% |
| Bakir | — | 0.09 mg | — |
| Beta Karoten | — | 577 µg | — |
| Beta kriptoksantin | — | 200 µg | — |
| Beta tokoferol | — | 0.07 mg | — |
| Beta tokotrienol | — | 0.1 mg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 8.5 mg | 1.1 mg | -87.1% |
| Delta tokoferol | — | 0 mg | — |
| Delta tokotrienol | — | 0 mg | — |
| Demir | 1.8 mg | 1.46 mg | -18.9% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | — | 0 g | — |
| Diyet lifi | 2.2 g | 1.4 g | -36.4% |
| DPA (22:5 n-3) | — | 0.01 g | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 1.15 mg | — |
| Enerji | — | 157 kj | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 231 kcal | — | — |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | — | 0 g | — |
| Fenilalanin | — | 0.47 g | — |
| Fosfor | 115 mg | 104 mg | -9.6% |
| Fruktoz | — | 0.98 g | — |
| Galaktoz | — | 0 g | — |
| Gama tokoferol | — | 0.08 mg | — |
| Gama tokotrienol | — | 0 mg | — |
| Glikoz | — | 1.07 g | — |
| Glisin | — | 0.83 g | — |
| Glutamik asit | — | 2.07 g | — |
| Hidroksiprolin | — | 0.24 g | — |
| Histidin | — | 0.37 g | — |
| Izolosin | — | 0.56 g | — |
| Kalsiyum | 35 mg | 34 mg | -2.9% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 27.4 g | 4.57 g | -83.3% |
| Kolesterol | 22 mg | 45 mg | +104.5% |
| Kül | — | 1.76 g | — |
| Laktoz | — | 0 g | — |
| Likopen | — | 4639 µg | — |
| Lizin | — | 0.84 g | — |
| Losin | — | 0.93 g | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | — | 367 µg | — |
| Magnezyum | 22 mg | 18 mg | -18.2% |
| Maltoz | — | 0 g | — |
| Mangan | — | 0.08 mg | — |
| Metiyonin | — | 0.28 g | — |
| MUFA 14:1 | — | 0.1 g | — |
| MUFA 15:1 | — | 0 g | — |
| MUFA 16:1 | — | 0.38 g | — |
| MUFA 16:1 c | — | 0.34 g | — |
| MUFA 17:1 | — | 0.08 g | — |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | — | 4.21 g | — |
| MUFA 18:1 c | — | 3.74 g | — |
| MUFA 20:1 | — | 0.03 g | — |
| MUFA 22:1 | — | 0 g | — |
| MUFA 22:1 c | — | 0 g | — |
| MUFA 24:1 c | — | 0 g | — |
| Niasin | 2.4 mg | 3.56 mg | +48.3% |
| Nisasta | — | 0.43 g | — |
| Pantotenik asit | — | 0.41 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 210 mg | 320 mg | +52.4% |
| Prolin | — | 0.85 g | — |
| Protein | 8.5 g | 12.56 g | +47.8% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | — | 0.54 g | — |
| PUFA 18:2 CLA | — | 0.07 g | — |
| PUFA 18:2 n-6 c,c | — | 0.41 g | — |
| PUFA 18:3 | — | 0.04 g | — |
| PUFA 18:3 n-6 | — | 0 g | — |
| PUFA 18:3i | — | 0 g | — |
| PUFA 18:4 | — | 0 g | — |
| PUFA 20:2 n-6 | — | 0.01 g | — |
| PUFA 20:3 | — | 0.02 g | — |
| PUFA 20:3 n-3 | — | 0 g | — |
| PUFA 20:3 n-6 | — | 0.02 g | — |
| PUFA 20:4 (arasidonik asit) | — | 0.03 g | — |
| PUFA 22:4 | — | 0.01 g | — |
| Retinol | — | 93 µg | — |
| Sakkaroz | — | 0.22 g | — |
| Selenyum | — | 13.1 µg | — |
| Serin | — | 0.37 g | — |
| SFA 10:0 | — | 0.01 g | — |
| SFA 12:0 | — | 0.01 g | — |
| SFA 14:0 | — | 0.31 g | — |
| SFA 15:0 | — | 0.05 g | — |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | — | 2.33 g | — |
| SFA 17:0 | — | 0.11 g | — |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | — | 1.31 g | — |
| SFA 20:0 | — | 0.01 g | — |
| SFA 22:0 | — | 0.01 g | — |
| SFA 24:0 | — | 0 g | — |
| SFA 4:0 (butirik asit) | — | 0 g | — |
| SFA 6:0 | — | 0 g | — |
| SFA 8:0 | — | 0 g | — |
| Sistin | — | 0.12 g | — |
| Sodyum | 420 mg | 381 mg | -9.3% |
| Su | 52 g | 71.31 g | +37.1% |
| TFA 16:1 t | — | 0.04 g | — |
| TFA 18:1 t | — | 0.47 g | — |
| TFA 18:2 t (tanımsız) | — | 0.07 g | — |
| TFA 22:1 t | — | 0 g | — |
| Tirozin | — | 0.34 g | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 3.5 g | 4.15 g | +18.6% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 4.81 g | — |
| Toplam trans yağ asitleri | — | 0.58 g | — |
| Toplam trans-monoenoik yağ asitleri | — | 0.51 g | — |
| Toplam trans-poliinoik yağ asitleri | — | 0.07 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 9.8 g | 9.79 g | -0.1% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 0.64 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 2.27 g | — |
| Treonin | — | 0.4 g | — |
| Triptofan | — | 0.14 g | — |
| Valin | — | 0.64 g | — |
| Çinko | 1.2 mg | 2.23 mg | +85.8% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Lahmacun and Applebee'S, Biber.
Applebee'S, Biber has less energy per 100 g (157 kcal versus 231 kcal).
For measured A Vitamini (RAE), Lahmacun has 45 µg and Applebee'S, Biber has 149 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Lahmacun 29, Applebee'S, Biber 47.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.