Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
82 kcal
Score
56 / 100
Atlantik morinası has a higher nutrition quality score (56) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
215 vs 82(-61.9%)
Score Diff
49 vs 56(+14.3%)
OVERALL WINNER
Atlantik morinası
Higher energy
Kuzu pöç
Score leader
Atlantik morinası
Nutrient split
14 - 5 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Kuzu pöç and Atlantik morinası are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Kuzu pöç has 215.0 kcal and Atlantik morinası has 82.0 kcal. The difference is 133.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 49 and 56. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Kuzu pöç | Atlantik morinası | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 12 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.076 mg | — |
| B12 Vitamini | 2.5 µg | 0.91 µg | -63.6% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.25 mg | 0.065 mg | -74.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.3 mg | 0.245 mg | -18.3% |
| Bakir | 0.15 mg | — | — |
| D Vitamini | — | 0.9 µg | — |
| Demir | 2.1 mg | 0.38 mg | -81.9% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | — | 0.12 g | — |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 215 kcal | — | — |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | — | 0.064 g | — |
| Fosfor | 230 mg | 203 mg | -11.7% |
| İyot | — | 110 µg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 15 mg | 16 mg | +6.7% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | — | 0 g | — |
| Karbonhidrat (toplamla) | 0 g | — | — |
| Kolesterol | 75 mg | 43 mg | -42.7% |
| Kül | — | 1.16 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 25 mg | 32 mg | +28.0% |
| Niasin | 7 mg | 2.063 mg | -70.5% |
| Potasyum | 280 mg | 413 mg | +47.5% |
| Protein | 28.5 g | 17.81 g | -37.5% |
| Selenyum | 25 µg | 33.1 µg | +32.4% |
| Sodyum | 70 mg | 54 mg | -22.9% |
| Su | 57 g | 81.22 g | +42.5% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 5.5 g | 0.131 g | -97.6% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 4.8 g | 0.094 g | -98.0% |
| Toplam yağ | 12.5 g | 0.67 g | -94.6% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.2 g | 0.212 g | -82.3% |
| Çinko | 4 mg | 0.45 mg | -88.8% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Kuzu pöç and Atlantik morinası.
Atlantik morinası has less energy per 100 g (82 kcal versus 215 kcal).
For measured Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri, Kuzu pöç has 4.8 g and Atlantik morinası has 0.094 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Kuzu pöç 49, Atlantik morinası 56.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.