Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
138 kcal
Score
71 / 100
Alabalık (Kırmızı Benekli) has a higher nutrition quality score (71) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
254 vs 138(-45.7%)
Score Diff
42 vs 71(+69.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Alabalık (Kırmızı Benekli)
Higher energy
Kuzu Kokoreç
Score leader
Alabalık (Kırmızı Benekli)
Nutrient split
10 - 7 (tie: 3)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Kuzu Kokoreç and Alabalık (Kırmızı Benekli) are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Kuzu Kokoreç has 254.0 kcal and Alabalık (Kırmızı Benekli) has 138.0 kcal. The difference is 116.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 42 and 71. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Kuzu Kokoreç | Alabalık (Kırmızı Benekli) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 24 µg | — |
| B12 Vitamini | 5.2 µg | 4.8 µg | -7.7% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.38 mg | — | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.22 mg | — | — |
| D Vitamini | — | 14.2 µg | — |
| Demir | 2.8 mg | 0.85 mg | -69.6% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | — | 0.68 g | — |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | — | 0.32 g | — |
| Fosfor | 195 mg | 260 mg | +33.3% |
| Kalsiyum | 28 mg | 28 mg | 0.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 0.6 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Kolesterol | 235 mg | 62 mg | -73.6% |
| Kül | 1.3 g | 1.3 g | 0.0% |
| Magnezyum | 16 mg | 31 mg | +93.8% |
| Niasin | 3.9 mg | 5.2 mg | +33.3% |
| Potasyum | 215 mg | 380 mg | +76.7% |
| Protein | 17.4 g | 20.5 g | +17.8% |
| Selenyum | 28.6 µg | 28.5 µg | -0.3% |
| Sodyum | 340 mg | 56 mg | -83.5% |
| Su | 60.5 g | 75.4 g | +24.6% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 9.4 g | 1.25 g | -86.7% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 7.9 g | 1.85 g | -76.6% |
| Toplam yağ | 20.2 g | 5.8 g | -71.3% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.3 g | 1.62 g | +24.6% |
| Çinko | 3.2 mg | 0.92 mg | -71.3% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Kuzu Kokoreç and Alabalık (Kırmızı Benekli).
Alabalık (Kırmızı Benekli) has less energy per 100 g (138 kcal versus 254 kcal).
For measured Karbonhidrat (farkla), Kuzu Kokoreç has 0.6 g and Alabalık (Kırmızı Benekli) has 0 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Kuzu Kokoreç 42, Alabalık (Kırmızı Benekli) 71.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.