Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
81 kcal
Score
67 / 100
Alaska pollock has a higher nutrition quality score (67) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
165 vs 81(-50.9%)
Score Diff
55 vs 67(+21.8%)
OVERALL WINNER
Alaska pollock
Higher energy
Kuzu İncik
Score leader
Alaska pollock
Nutrient split
13 - 6 (tie: 3)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Kuzu İncik and Alaska pollock are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Kuzu İncik has 165.0 kcal and Alaska pollock has 81.0 kcal. The difference is 84.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 55 and 67. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
22 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Kuzu İncik | Alaska pollock | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.11 mg | 0.046 mg | -58.2% |
| B12 Vitamini | 2.45 µg | 3.1 µg | +26.5% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.24 mg | 0.106 mg | -55.8% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.42 mg | 0.25 mg | -40.5% |
| D Vitamini | — | 1.2 µg | — |
| Demir | 1.95 mg | 0.24 mg | -87.7% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | — | 0.2 g | — |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | — | 0.12 g | — |
| Fosfor | 192 mg | 184 mg | -4.2% |
| Kalsiyum | 14 mg | 10 mg | -28.6% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Kolesterol | 71 mg | 71 mg | 0.0% |
| Kül | — | 1.2 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 22 mg | 67 mg | +204.5% |
| Niasin | 6.1 mg | 1.32 mg | -78.4% |
| Potasyum | 315 mg | 356 mg | +13.0% |
| Protein | 20.2 g | 17.18 g | -15.0% |
| Selenyum | 26.4 µg | 36.5 µg | +38.3% |
| Sodyum | 68 mg | 99 mg | +45.6% |
| Su | 69.5 g | 81.18 g | +16.8% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 3.8 g | 0.14 g | -96.3% |
| Toplam Kolin | 83.5 mg | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 3.7 g | 0.12 g | -96.8% |
| Toplam yağ | 9.2 g | 0.8 g | -91.3% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.72 g | 0.34 g | -52.8% |
| Çinko | 4.52 mg | 0.46 mg | -89.8% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Kuzu İncik and Alaska pollock.
Alaska pollock has less energy per 100 g (81 kcal versus 165 kcal).
For measured Magnezyum, Kuzu İncik has 22 mg and Alaska pollock has 67 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Kuzu İncik 55, Alaska pollock 67.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.