Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Kuşburnu marmeladı has a higher nutrition quality score (29) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
242 vs 263(+8.7%)
Score Diff
29 vs 6(-79.3%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kuşburnu marmeladı
Higher energy
Ahududu reçeli
Score leader
Kuşburnu marmeladı
Nutrient split
13 - 4 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Kuşburnu marmeladı and Ahududu reçeli are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Kuşburnu marmeladı has 242.0 kcal and Ahududu reçeli has 263.0 kcal. The difference is 21.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 29 and 6. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
17 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Kuşburnu marmeladı | Ahududu reçeli | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 43.3 µg | 2 µg | -95.4% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.022 mg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.054 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | — | 0.04 mg | — |
| Beta Karoten | 520 µg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 68.5 mg | 8 mg | -88.3% |
| Demir | 1.15 mg | 0.4 mg | -65.2% |
| Diyet lifi | 4.1 g | 1.1 g | -73.2% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 242 kcal | 263 kcal | +8.7% |
| Folat DFE | — | 5 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 24 mg | 9 mg | -62.5% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 1.2 µg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 62 mg | 15 mg | -75.8% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 61.2 g | 68 g | +11.1% |
| Kül | 0.75 g | 0.3 g | -60.0% |
| Likopen | 1820 µg | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 28 mg | 6 mg | -78.6% |
| Mangan | — | 0.15 mg | — |
| Niasin | 0.48 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 245 mg | 77 mg | -68.6% |
| Protein | 0.95 g | 0.4 g | -57.9% |
| Sodyum | 8 mg | 12 mg | +50.0% |
| Su | 36.8 g | 30.2 g | -17.9% |
| Toplam yağ | 0.35 g | 0.1 g | -71.4% |
| Toplam Şeker | 54.6 g | 60.3 g | +10.4% |
| Çinko | 0.32 mg | 0.08 mg | -75.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Kuşburnu marmeladı and Ahududu reçeli.
Kuşburnu marmeladı has less energy per 100 g (242 kcal versus 263 kcal).
For measured A Vitamini (RAE), Kuşburnu marmeladı has 43.3 µg and Ahududu reçeli has 2 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Kuşburnu marmeladı 29, Ahududu reçeli 6.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.