Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
314 kcal
Score
42 / 100
Arı Poleni has a higher nutrition quality score (42) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
387 vs 314(-18.9%)
Score Diff
9 vs 42(+366.7%)
OVERALL WINNER
Arı Poleni
Higher energy
Kuruyemiş - Çiğ
Score leader
Arı Poleni
Nutrient split
3 - 15 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Kuruyemiş, Meşe Palamudu, Çiğ and Arı Poleni are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Kuruyemiş, Meşe Palamudu, Çiğ has 387.0 kcal and Arı Poleni has 314.0 kcal. The difference is 73.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 9 and 42. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Kuruyemiş - Çiğ | Arı Poleni | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (IU) | 39 iu | — | — |
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 2 µg | — | — |
| Alanin | 0.35 g | — | — |
| Arjinin | 0.47 g | — | — |
| Aspartik asit | 0.64 g | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.11 mg | 0.9 mg | +718.2% |
| B12 Vitamini | 0 µg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.12 mg | 0.6 mg | +400.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.53 mg | 0.9 mg | +69.8% |
| Bakir | 0.62 mg | 1.1 mg | +77.4% |
| Besin folati | 87 µg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 0 mg | 20 mg | — |
| Demir | 0.79 mg | 9 mg | +1039.2% |
| Diyet lifi | — | 12 g | — |
| Enerji | 387 kj | — | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 314 kcal | — |
| Fenilalanin | 0.27 g | — | — |
| Folat DFE | 87 µg | — | — |
| Folik asit | 0 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 79 mg | 600 mg | +659.5% |
| Glisin | 0.28 g | — | — |
| Glutamik asit | 0.99 g | — | — |
| Histidin | 0.17 g | — | — |
| Izolosin | 0.28 g | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 41 mg | 120 mg | +192.7% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 40.75 g | 40 g | -1.8% |
| Kolesterol | 0 mg | — | — |
| Kül | 1.35 g | 3 g | +122.2% |
| Lizin | 0.38 g | — | — |
| Losin | 0.49 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 62 mg | — | — |
| Mangan | 1.34 mg | 4.5 mg | +235.8% |
| Metiyonin | 0.1 g | — | — |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 15.11 g | — | — |
| Niasin | 1.83 mg | — | — |
| Pantotenik asit | 0.71 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 539 mg | 600 mg | +11.3% |
| Prolin | 0.25 g | — | — |
| Protein | 6.15 g | 24 g | +290.2% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | 4.6 g | — | — |
| Retinol | 0 µg | — | — |
| Serin | 0.26 g | — | — |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | 2.85 g | — | — |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | 0.25 g | — | — |
| Sistin | 0.11 g | — | — |
| Sodyum | 0 mg | 30 mg | — |
| Su | 27.9 g | 10 g | -64.2% |
| Tirozin | 0.19 g | — | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 3.1 g | — | — |
| Toplam Folat | 87 µg | 500 µg | +474.7% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 15.11 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 23.86 g | 5 g | -79.0% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 4.6 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 30 g | — |
| Treonin | 0.24 g | — | — |
| Triptofan | 0.07 g | — | — |
| Valin | 0.34 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 0.51 mg | 4 mg | +684.3% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Kuruyemiş, Meşe Palamudu, Çiğ and Arı Poleni.
Arı Poleni has less energy per 100 g (314 kcal versus 387 kcal).
For measured Demir, Kuruyemiş - Çiğ has 0.79 mg and Arı Poleni has 9 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Kuruyemiş - Çiğ 9, Arı Poleni 42.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.