Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
884 kcal
Score
— / 100
At least one nutrition score lacks comparable measurements, so no overall winner is assigned.
Energy Diff
372 vs 884(+137.6%)
Score Diff
20 vs —
Higher energy
Aspir Yağı
Score leader
Insufficient data
Nutrient split
8 - 7 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Kuru üzüm çekirdeği and Aspir Yağı are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Kuru üzüm çekirdeği has 372.0 kcal and Aspir Yağı has 884.0 kcal. The difference is 512.0 kcal.
There are not enough comparable micronutrient measurements for a score comparison.
15 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Kuru üzüm çekirdeği | Aspir Yağı | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bakir | 0.65 mg | — | — |
| Demir | 3.8 mg | 0.07 mg | -98.2% |
| Diyet lifi | 58.5 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 8.5 mg | 34.1 mg | +301.2% |
| Fitosteroller | — | 444 mg | — |
| Fosfor | 220 mg | — | — |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 7.1 µg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 65 mg | — | — |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 62.1 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Kolesterol | — | 0 mg | — |
| Kül | 2.8 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Magnezyum | 115 mg | — | — |
| Mangan | 1.1 mg | — | — |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 2.5 g | 14.35 g | +474.0% |
| Potasyum | 380 mg | — | — |
| Protein | 10.2 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | 9.2 g | 74.62 g | +711.1% |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | — | 4.3 g | — |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | — | 1.9 g | — |
| Sodyum | 12 mg | 0 mg | -100.0% |
| Su | 7.4 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 2.1 g | 6.2 g | +195.2% |
| Toplam Kolin | — | 0.2 mg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 2.6 g | 14.36 g | +452.3% |
| Toplam yağ | 14.5 g | 100 g | +589.7% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 9.4 g | 74.62 g | +693.8% |
| Toplam Şeker | 1.2 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 1.45 mg | 0 mg | -100.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Kuru üzüm çekirdeği and Aspir Yağı.
Kuru üzüm çekirdeği has less energy per 100 g (372 kcal versus 884 kcal).
For measured PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit), Kuru üzüm çekirdeği has 9.2 g and Aspir Yağı has 74.62 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Kuru üzüm çekirdeği 20, Aspir Yağı —.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.