Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
324.2 kcal
Score
55 / 100
Kuru kişniş yaprağı has a higher nutrition quality score (87) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
279 vs 324.2(+16.2%)
Score Diff
87 vs 55(-36.8%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kuru kişniş yaprağı
Higher energy
Amchur
Score leader
Kuru kişniş yaprağı
Nutrient split
15 - 4 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Kuru kişniş yaprağı and Amchur are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Kuru kişniş yaprağı has 279.0 kcal and Amchur has 324.2 kcal. The difference is 45.2 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 87 and 55. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Kuru kişniş yaprağı | Amchur | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 293 µg | 22 µg | -92.5% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 1.252 mg | 0.08 mg | -93.6% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 1.5 mg | 0.09 mg | -94.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.606 mg | 0.22 mg | -63.7% |
| Bakir | 2.1 mg | 0.35 mg | -83.3% |
| Beta Karoten | — | 260 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 20 mg | 52 mg | +160.0% |
| Demir | 82.43 mg | 24.5 mg | -70.3% |
| Diyet lifi | 10.4 g | 12.8 g | +23.1% |
| Folat DFE | — | 28 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 481 mg | 75 mg | -84.4% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 1359.5 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 1246 mg | 180 mg | -85.6% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 52.1 g | 80.2 g | +53.9% |
| Kül | — | 5.3 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 694 mg | 82 mg | -88.2% |
| Mangan | 8.8 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | 10.707 mg | 1.4 mg | -86.9% |
| Potasyum | 4466 mg | 640 mg | -85.7% |
| Protein | 21.93 g | 3.2 g | -85.4% |
| Sodyum | 211 mg | 35 mg | -83.4% |
| Su | 7.3 g | 9.5 g | +30.1% |
| Toplam Folat | 274 µg | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 4.78 g | 1.8 g | -62.3% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 21.4 g | — |
| Çinko | 4.72 mg | 1.1 mg | -76.7% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Kuru kişniş yaprağı and Amchur.
Kuru kişniş yaprağı has less energy per 100 g (279 kcal versus 324.2 kcal).
For measured C Vitamini (askorbik asit), Kuru kişniş yaprağı has 20 mg and Amchur has 52 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Kuru kişniş yaprağı 87, Amchur 55.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.