Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
368 kcal
Score
32 / 100
Kuru iç bakla has a higher nutrition quality score (42) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
341 vs 368(+7.9%)
Score Diff
42 vs 32(-23.8%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kuru iç bakla
Higher energy
Altın kinoa
Score leader
Kuru iç bakla
Nutrient split
12 - 9 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Kuru iç bakla and Altın kinoa are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Kuru iç bakla has 341.0 kcal and Altın kinoa has 368.0 kcal. The difference is 27.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 42 and 32. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
21 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Kuru iç bakla | Altın kinoa | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.555 mg | 0.36 mg | -35.1% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.29 mg | 0.32 mg | +10.3% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.366 mg | 0.49 mg | +33.9% |
| Bakir | 0.824 mg | 0.59 mg | -28.4% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 1.4 mg | — | — |
| Demir | 6.7 mg | 4.57 mg | -31.8% |
| Diyet lifi | 25 g | 7 g | -72.0% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 2.44 mg | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 368 kcal | — |
| Fosfor | 421 mg | 457 mg | +8.6% |
| Kalsiyum | 103 mg | 47 mg | -54.4% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 58.29 g | 64.16 g | +10.1% |
| Kül | 3.08 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 192 mg | 197 mg | +2.6% |
| Mangan | 1.626 mg | 2 mg | +23.0% |
| Niasin | 2.83 mg | 1.52 mg | -46.3% |
| Potasyum | 1062 mg | 563 mg | -47.0% |
| Protein | 26.12 g | 14.12 g | -45.9% |
| Selenyum | 8.2 µg | 8.5 µg | +3.7% |
| Sodyum | 13 mg | 5 mg | -61.5% |
| Su | 10.98 g | 13.28 g | +20.9% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.29 g | — | — |
| Toplam Folat | 423 µg | 184 µg | -56.5% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.33 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 1.53 g | 6.07 g | +296.7% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.63 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 5.7 g | 0.1 g | -98.2% |
| Çinko | 3.14 mg | 3.1 mg | -1.3% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Kuru iç bakla and Altın kinoa.
Kuru iç bakla has less energy per 100 g (341 kcal versus 368 kcal).
For measured Toplam yağ, Kuru iç bakla has 1.53 g and Altın kinoa has 6.07 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Kuru iç bakla 42, Altın kinoa 32.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.