Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
329 kcal
Score
41 / 100
Kuru iç bakla has a higher nutrition quality score (42) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
341 vs 329(-3.5%)
Score Diff
42 vs 41(-2.4%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kuru iç bakla
Higher energy
Kuru iç bakla
Score leader
Kuru iç bakla
Nutrient split
13 - 8 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Kuru iç bakla and Adzuki fasulyesi are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Kuru iç bakla has 341.0 kcal and Adzuki fasulyesi has 329.0 kcal. The difference is 12.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 42 and 41. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
21 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Kuru iç bakla | Adzuki fasulyesi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.555 mg | 0.455 mg | -18.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.29 mg | 0.22 mg | -24.1% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.366 mg | 0.351 mg | -4.1% |
| Bakir | 0.824 mg | 1.09 mg | +32.3% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 1.4 mg | — | — |
| Demir | 6.7 mg | 4.98 mg | -25.7% |
| Diyet lifi | 25 g | 12.7 g | -49.2% |
| Fosfor | 421 mg | 381 mg | -9.5% |
| Kalsiyum | 103 mg | 66 mg | -35.9% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 58.29 g | 62.96 g | +8.0% |
| Kül | 3.08 g | 3.82 g | +24.0% |
| Magnezyum | 192 mg | 127 mg | -33.9% |
| Mangan | 1.626 mg | 1.73 mg | +6.4% |
| Niasin | 2.83 mg | 2.63 mg | -7.1% |
| Pantotenik asit | — | 1.47 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 1062 mg | 1254 mg | +18.1% |
| Protein | 26.12 g | 19.87 g | -23.9% |
| Selenyum | 8.2 µg | 3.2 µg | -61.0% |
| Sodyum | 13 mg | 5 mg | -61.5% |
| Su | 10.98 g | 16.32 g | +48.6% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.29 g | — | — |
| Toplam Folat | 423 µg | 622 µg | +47.0% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.33 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 1.53 g | 0.53 g | -65.4% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.63 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 5.7 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 3.14 mg | 5.04 mg | +60.5% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Kuru iç bakla and Adzuki fasulyesi.
Adzuki fasulyesi has less energy per 100 g (329 kcal versus 341 kcal).
For measured Toplam yağ, Kuru iç bakla has 1.53 g and Adzuki fasulyesi has 0.53 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Kuru iç bakla 42, Adzuki fasulyesi 41.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.