Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
304 kcal
Score
2 / 100
Akasya Balı has a higher nutrition quality score (2) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
387 vs 304(-21.4%)
Score Diff
0 vs 2(+100.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Akasya Balı
Higher energy
Küp şeker
Score leader
Akasya Balı
Nutrient split
3 - 15 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Küp şeker and Akasya Balı are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Küp şeker has 387.0 kcal and Akasya Balı has 304.0 kcal. The difference is 83.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 0 and 2. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Küp şeker | Akasya Balı | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.038 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0.024 mg | — |
| Bakir | 0.01 mg | 0.036 mg | +260.0% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 0.5 mg | — |
| Demir | 0.05 mg | 0.42 mg | +740.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | 0.2 g | — |
| Enerji | 1619 kj | — | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 387 kcal | — | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 2 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 0 mg | 4 mg | — |
| Fruktoz | 0 g | 43.5 g | — |
| Glikoz | 0 g | 29.8 g | — |
| Kalsiyum | 1 mg | 6 mg | +500.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 99.98 g | 82.4 g | -17.6% |
| Kül | 0.01 g | 0.2 g | +1900.0% |
| Magnezyum | 0 mg | 2 mg | — |
| Maltoz | — | 2.1 g | — |
| Mangan | — | 0.08 mg | — |
| Niasin | — | 0.12 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 2 mg | 52 mg | +2500.0% |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.3 g | — |
| Sakkaroz | 99.8 g | 1.9 g | -98.1% |
| Selenyum | 0.6 µg | 0.8 µg | +33.3% |
| Sodyum | 1 mg | 4 mg | +300.0% |
| Su | 0.02 g | 17.1 g | +85400.0% |
| Toplam yağ | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 99.8 g | 82.1 g | -17.7% |
| Çinko | 0.01 mg | 0.22 mg | +2100.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Küp şeker and Akasya Balı.
Akasya Balı has less energy per 100 g (304 kcal versus 387 kcal).
For measured Su, Küp şeker has 0.02 g and Akasya Balı has 17.1 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Küp şeker 0, Akasya Balı 2.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.