Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
198 kcal
Score
54 / 100
Biftek Teriyaki has a higher nutrition quality score (54) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
129 vs 198(+53.5%)
Score Diff
26 vs 54(+107.7%)
OVERALL WINNER
Biftek Teriyaki
Higher energy
Biftek Teriyaki
Score leader
Biftek Teriyaki
Nutrient split
21 - 29 (tie: 15)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Kung Pao Tavuk and Biftek Teriyaki are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Kung Pao Tavuk has 129.0 kcal and Biftek Teriyaki has 198.0 kcal. The difference is 69.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 26 and 54. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
65 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Kung Pao Tavuk | Biftek Teriyaki | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 65 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| Alfa Karoten | 341 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.03 mg | 0.07 mg | +133.3% |
| B12 Vitamini | 0.11 µg | 1.57 µg | +1327.3% |
| B12 Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.06 mg | 0.16 mg | +166.7% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.24 mg | 0.38 mg | +58.3% |
| Bakir | 0.07 mg | 0.08 mg | +14.3% |
| Besin folati | 16 µg | 10 µg | -37.5% |
| Beta Karoten | 601 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| Beta kriptoksantin | 16 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 7.1 mg | 0 mg | -100.0% |
| D Vitamini | 0 µg | 0.1 µg | — |
| Demir | 0.76 mg | 2.53 mg | +232.9% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Diyet lifi | 1.5 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| DPA (22:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0.01 g | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 1.02 mg | 0.39 mg | -61.8% |
| E Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Enerji | 129 kj | 198 kj | +53.5% |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Etil alkol | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Folat DFE | 16 µg | 10 µg | -37.5% |
| Folik asit | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 94 mg | 196 mg | +108.5% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 13.6 µg | 1.4 µg | -89.7% |
| Kafein | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 20 mg | 10 mg | -50.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 6.87 g | 1.94 g | -71.8% |
| Kolesterol | 26 mg | 82 mg | +215.4% |
| Likopen | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 226 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| Magnezyum | 24 mg | 26 mg | +8.3% |
| MUFA 16:1 | 0.08 g | 0.35 g | +337.5% |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 2.04 g | 3.16 g | +54.9% |
| MUFA 20:1 | 0.04 g | 0.01 g | -75.0% |
| MUFA 22:1 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Niasin | 2.76 mg | 5.07 mg | +83.7% |
| Potasyum | 218 mg | 259 mg | +18.8% |
| Protein | 9.76 g | 28.86 g | +195.7% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | 2.71 g | 0.22 g | -91.9% |
| PUFA 18:3 | 0.25 g | 0.08 g | -68.0% |
| PUFA 18:4 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| PUFA 20:4 (arasidonik asit) | 0.03 g | 0.02 g | -33.3% |
| Retinol | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Selenyum | 8.1 µg | 29.2 µg | +260.5% |
| SFA 10:0 | 0 g | 0.02 g | — |
| SFA 12:0 | 0 g | 0.02 g | — |
| SFA 14:0 | 0.01 g | 0.24 g | +2300.0% |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | 0.9 g | 1.95 g | +116.7% |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | 0.29 g | 0.9 g | +210.3% |
| SFA 4:0 (butirik asit) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 6:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 8:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Sodyum | 402 mg | 517 mg | +28.6% |
| Su | 74.78 g | 58.92 g | -21.2% |
| Teobromin | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.35 g | 3.13 g | +131.9% |
| Toplam Folat | 16 µg | 10 µg | -37.5% |
| Toplam Kolin | 37.4 mg | 109.5 mg | +192.8% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 2.17 g | 3.52 g | +62.2% |
| Toplam yağ | 6.98 g | 8.25 g | +18.2% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 3.02 g | 0.34 g | -88.7% |
| Toplam Şeker | 3.03 g | 1.76 g | -41.9% |
| Çinko | 0.74 mg | 4.78 mg | +545.9% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Kung Pao Tavuk and Biftek Teriyaki.
Kung Pao Tavuk has less energy per 100 g (129 kcal versus 198 kcal).
For measured SFA 14:0, Kung Pao Tavuk has 0.01 g and Biftek Teriyaki has 0.24 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Kung Pao Tavuk 26, Biftek Teriyaki 54.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.