Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
195 kcal
Score
26 / 100
Kung Pao Domuz has a higher nutrition quality score (30) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
219 vs 195(-11.0%)
Score Diff
30 vs 26(-13.3%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kung Pao Domuz
Higher energy
Kung Pao Domuz
Score leader
Kung Pao Domuz
Nutrient split
27 - 18 (tie: 20)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Kung Pao Domuz and Bademli Tavuk are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Kung Pao Domuz has 219.0 kcal and Bademli Tavuk has 195.0 kcal. The difference is 24.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 30 and 26. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
65 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Kung Pao Domuz | Bademli Tavuk | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 16 µg | 19 µg | +18.8% |
| Alfa Karoten | 2 µg | 2 µg | 0.0% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.54 mg | 0.05 mg | -90.7% |
| B12 Vitamini | 0.38 µg | 0.19 µg | -50.0% |
| B12 Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.21 mg | 0.21 mg | 0.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.36 mg | 0.18 mg | -50.0% |
| Bakir | 0.08 mg | 0.14 mg | +75.0% |
| Besin folati | 15 µg | 15 µg | 0.0% |
| Beta Karoten | 159 µg | 160 µg | +0.6% |
| Beta kriptoksantin | 41 µg | 41 µg | 0.0% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 12 mg | 11.8 mg | -1.7% |
| D Vitamini | 0.4 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| Demir | 0.84 mg | 0.82 mg | -2.4% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Diyet lifi | 1 g | 1.2 g | +20.0% |
| DPA (22:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 1.59 mg | 3.15 mg | +98.1% |
| E Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Enerji | 219 kj | 195 kj | -11.0% |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Etil alkol | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Folat DFE | 15 µg | 15 µg | 0.0% |
| Folik asit | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 165 mg | 166 mg | +0.6% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 13.7 µg | 13.7 µg | 0.0% |
| Kafein | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 22 mg | 36 mg | +63.6% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 4.55 g | 4.46 g | -2.0% |
| Kolesterol | 41 mg | 57 mg | +39.0% |
| Likopen | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 49 µg | 50 µg | +2.0% |
| Magnezyum | 33 mg | 37 mg | +12.1% |
| MUFA 16:1 | 0.18 g | 0.27 g | +50.0% |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 6.41 g | 6.04 g | -5.8% |
| MUFA 20:1 | 0.13 g | 0.04 g | -69.2% |
| MUFA 22:1 | 0.01 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Niasin | 4.35 mg | 4.34 mg | -0.2% |
| Potasyum | 313 mg | 243 mg | -22.4% |
| Protein | 16.89 g | 15.66 g | -7.3% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | 3.2 g | 3.52 g | +10.0% |
| PUFA 18:3 | 0.23 g | 0.24 g | +4.3% |
| PUFA 18:4 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| PUFA 20:4 (arasidonik asit) | 0.02 g | 0.01 g | -50.0% |
| Retinol | 1 µg | 4 µg | +300.0% |
| Selenyum | 18.8 µg | 12.6 µg | -33.0% |
| SFA 10:0 | 0.01 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| SFA 12:0 | 0.01 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| SFA 14:0 | 0.07 g | 0.02 g | -71.4% |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | 1.98 g | 1.46 g | -26.3% |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | 0.86 g | 0.38 g | -55.8% |
| SFA 4:0 (butirik asit) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 6:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 8:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Sodyum | 183 mg | 330 mg | +80.3% |
| Su | 62.59 g | 65.46 g | +4.6% |
| Teobromin | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 3.2 g | 1.92 g | -40.0% |
| Toplam Folat | 15 µg | 16 µg | +6.7% |
| Toplam Kolin | 56.6 mg | 39.3 mg | -30.6% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 6.75 g | 6.37 g | -5.6% |
| Toplam yağ | 14.76 g | 13.16 g | -10.8% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 3.47 g | 3.78 g | +8.9% |
| Toplam Şeker | 1.43 g | 1.42 g | -0.7% |
| Çinko | 1.58 mg | 1.14 mg | -27.8% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Kung Pao Domuz and Bademli Tavuk.
Bademli Tavuk has less energy per 100 g (195 kcal versus 219 kcal).
For measured Retinol, Kung Pao Domuz has 1 µg and Bademli Tavuk has 4 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Kung Pao Domuz 30, Bademli Tavuk 26.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.