Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
268.8 kcal
Score
42 / 100
Adana kebabı has a higher nutrition quality score (42) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
322 vs 268.8(-16.5%)
Score Diff
13 vs 42(+223.1%)
OVERALL WINNER
Adana kebabı
Higher energy
Kumru Ekmeği
Score leader
Adana kebabı
Nutrient split
8 - 9 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Kumru Ekmeği and Adana kebabı are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Kumru Ekmeği has 322.0 kcal and Adana kebabı has 268.8 kcal. The difference is 53.2 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 13 and 42. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Kumru Ekmeği | Adana kebabı | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 28 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.28 mg | — | — |
| B12 Vitamini | — | 2.1 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.15 mg | — | — |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0.32 mg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 4.2 mg | — |
| Demir | 2.4 mg | 1.9 mg | -20.8% |
| Diyet lifi | 3.4 g | 0.4 g | -88.2% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 322 kcal | — | — |
| Folat DFE | 68 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 135 mg | 165 mg | +22.2% |
| Kalsiyum | 85 mg | 16 mg | -81.2% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 53.5 g | 1.2 g | -97.8% |
| Kolesterol | — | 75 mg | — |
| Kül | 1.9 g | 1.9 g | 0.0% |
| Magnezyum | 42 mg | 18 mg | -57.1% |
| Niasin | 2.8 mg | 4.8 mg | +71.4% |
| Potasyum | 165 mg | 265 mg | +60.6% |
| Protein | 10.2 g | 16.5 g | +61.8% |
| Sodyum | 480 mg | 460 mg | -4.2% |
| Su | 30.2 g | 55.4 g | +83.4% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.3 g | 10.2 g | +684.6% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 2.6 g | 9.1 g | +250.0% |
| Toplam yağ | 7.8 g | 22 g | +182.1% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 3.4 g | 1.1 g | -67.6% |
| Toplam Şeker | 2.1 g | 0.6 g | -71.4% |
| Çinko | 1.2 mg | 3.6 mg | +200.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Kumru Ekmeği and Adana kebabı.
Adana kebabı has less energy per 100 g (268.8 kcal versus 322 kcal).
For measured Toplam doymus yağ asitleri, Kumru Ekmeği has 1.3 g and Adana kebabı has 10.2 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Kumru Ekmeği 13, Adana kebabı 42.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.