Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
82 kcal
Score
56 / 100
Kum midyesi has a higher nutrition quality score (95) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
74 vs 82(+10.8%)
Score Diff
95 vs 56(-41.1%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kum midyesi
Higher energy
Atlantik morinası
Score leader
Kum midyesi
Nutrient split
14 - 8 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Kum midyesi and Atlantik morinası are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Kum midyesi has 74.0 kcal and Atlantik morinası has 82.0 kcal. The difference is 8.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 95 and 56. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
23 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Kum midyesi | Atlantik morinası | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 90 µg | 12 µg | -86.7% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.09 mg | 0.076 mg | -15.6% |
| B12 Vitamini | 49.4 µg | 0.91 µg | -98.2% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.21 mg | 0.065 mg | -69.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.05 mg | 0.245 mg | +390.0% |
| Bakir | 0.34 mg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 13 mg | — | — |
| D Vitamini | — | 0.9 µg | — |
| Demir | 13.98 mg | 0.38 mg | -97.3% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | — | 0.12 g | — |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | — | 0.064 g | — |
| Fosfor | 169 mg | 203 mg | +20.1% |
| İyot | — | 110 µg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 46 mg | 16 mg | -65.2% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 2.57 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Kolesterol | 34 mg | 43 mg | +26.5% |
| Kül | — | 1.16 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 18 mg | 32 mg | +77.8% |
| Niasin | 1.76 mg | 2.063 mg | +17.2% |
| Potasyum | 314 mg | 413 mg | +31.5% |
| Protein | 12.77 g | 17.81 g | +39.5% |
| Selenyum | 24.3 µg | 33.1 µg | +36.2% |
| Sodyum | 56 mg | 54 mg | -3.6% |
| Su | 81.82 g | 81.22 g | -0.7% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.19 g | 0.131 g | -31.1% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.11 g | 0.094 g | -14.5% |
| Toplam yağ | 0.97 g | 0.67 g | -30.9% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.28 g | 0.212 g | -24.3% |
| Çinko | 1.37 mg | 0.45 mg | -67.2% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Kum midyesi and Atlantik morinası.
Kum midyesi has less energy per 100 g (74 kcal versus 82 kcal).
For measured B6 Vitamini, Kum midyesi has 0.05 mg and Atlantik morinası has 0.245 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Kum midyesi 95, Atlantik morinası 56.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.