Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Kum midyesi has a higher nutrition quality score (95) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
74 vs 138(+86.5%)
Score Diff
95 vs 71(-25.3%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kum midyesi
Higher energy
Alabalık (Kırmızı Benekli)
Score leader
Kum midyesi
Nutrient split
7 - 11 (tie: 2)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Kum midyesi and Alabalık (Kırmızı Benekli) are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Kum midyesi has 74.0 kcal and Alabalık (Kırmızı Benekli) has 138.0 kcal. The difference is 64.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 95 and 71. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Kum midyesi | Alabalık (Kırmızı Benekli) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 90 µg | 24 µg | -73.3% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.09 mg | — | — |
| B12 Vitamini | 49.4 µg | 4.8 µg | -90.3% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.21 mg | — | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.05 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | 0.34 mg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 13 mg | — | — |
| D Vitamini | — | 14.2 µg | — |
| Demir | 13.98 mg | 0.85 mg | -93.9% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | — | 0.68 g | — |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | — | 0.32 g | — |
| Fosfor | 169 mg | 260 mg | +53.8% |
| Kalsiyum | 46 mg | 28 mg | -39.1% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 2.57 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Kolesterol | 34 mg | 62 mg | +82.4% |
| Kül | — | 1.3 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 18 mg | 31 mg | +72.2% |
| Niasin | 1.76 mg | 5.2 mg | +195.5% |
| Potasyum | 314 mg | 380 mg | +21.0% |
| Protein | 12.77 g | 20.5 g | +60.5% |
| Selenyum | 24.3 µg | 28.5 µg | +17.3% |
| Sodyum | 56 mg | 56 mg | 0.0% |
| Su | 81.82 g | 75.4 g | -7.8% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.19 g | 1.25 g | +557.9% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.11 g | 1.85 g | +1581.8% |
| Toplam yağ | 0.97 g | 5.8 g | +497.9% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.28 g | 1.62 g | +478.6% |
| Çinko | 1.37 mg | 0.92 mg | -32.8% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Kum midyesi and Alabalık (Kırmızı Benekli).
Kum midyesi has less energy per 100 g (74 kcal versus 138 kcal).
For measured Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri, Kum midyesi has 0.11 g and Alabalık (Kırmızı Benekli) has 1.85 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Kum midyesi 95, Alabalık (Kırmızı Benekli) 71.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.