Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
125 kcal
Score
26 / 100
Kıymalı pide has a higher nutrition quality score (29) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
252.8 vs 125(-50.5%)
Score Diff
29 vs 26(-10.3%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kıymalı pide
Higher energy
Kıymalı pide
Score leader
Kıymalı pide
Nutrient split
17 - 4 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Kıymalı pide and Analı kızlı are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Kıymalı pide has 252.8 kcal and Analı kızlı has 125.0 kcal. The difference is 127.8 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 29 and 26. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
21 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Kıymalı pide | Analı kızlı | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 28 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.15 mg | 0.11 mg | -26.7% |
| B12 Vitamini | 0.72 µg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.12 mg | 0.08 mg | -33.3% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.18 mg | 0.14 mg | -22.2% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 3.6 mg | 2.6 mg | -27.8% |
| Demir | 2.1 mg | 1.45 mg | -31.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 1.8 g | 2.3 g | +27.8% |
| Fosfor | 125 mg | 78 mg | -37.6% |
| Kalsiyum | 28 mg | 24 mg | -14.3% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 32.1 g | 14.2 g | -55.8% |
| Kolesterol | 28 mg | 12 mg | -57.1% |
| Kül | — | 1.2 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 22 mg | 26 mg | +18.2% |
| Niasin | 2.8 mg | 1.65 mg | -41.1% |
| Potasyum | 205 mg | 220 mg | +7.3% |
| Protein | 10.4 g | 5.6 g | -46.2% |
| Sodyum | 480 mg | 325 mg | -32.3% |
| Su | 44.5 g | 76.2 g | +71.2% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 3.8 g | 1.75 g | -53.9% |
| Toplam Folat | — | 34 µg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 3.9 g | 2.15 g | -44.9% |
| Toplam yağ | 9.2 g | 5.1 g | -44.6% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.1 g | 0.82 g | -25.5% |
| Toplam Şeker | 1.6 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 1.6 mg | 1.12 mg | -30.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Kıymalı pide and Analı kızlı.
Analı kızlı has less energy per 100 g (125 kcal versus 252.8 kcal).
For measured Su, Kıymalı pide has 44.5 g and Analı kızlı has 76.2 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Kıymalı pide 29, Analı kızlı 26.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.