Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
32 kcal
Score
47 / 100
Yeşil papaya has a higher nutrition quality score (47) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
90 vs 32(-64.4%)
Score Diff
30 vs 47(+56.7%)
OVERALL WINNER
Yeşil papaya
Higher energy
Kırmızı muz
Score leader
Yeşil papaya
Nutrient split
12 - 4 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Kırmızı muz and Yeşil papaya are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Kırmızı muz has 90.0 kcal and Yeşil papaya has 32.0 kcal. The difference is 58.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 30 and 47. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
17 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Kırmızı muz | Yeşil papaya | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 24 µg | 24 µg | 0.0% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.02 mg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.03 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.3 mg | 0.03 mg | -90.0% |
| Beta Karoten | 288 µg | 274 µg | -4.9% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 8.7 mg | 60.9 mg | +600.0% |
| Demir | 0.26 mg | 0.25 mg | -3.8% |
| Diyet lifi | 2.6 g | 1.8 g | -30.8% |
| Folat DFE | — | 38 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 22 mg | 5 mg | -77.3% |
| Fruktoz | 4.85 g | — | — |
| Glikoz | 4.98 g | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 5 mg | 24 mg | +380.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 22.84 g | 8.8 g | -61.5% |
| Kül | 0.82 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 27 mg | 10 mg | -63.0% |
| Niasin | — | 0.35 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 358 mg | 180 mg | -49.7% |
| Protein | 1.09 g | 0.6 g | -45.0% |
| Sodyum | 1 mg | 3 mg | +200.0% |
| Su | 74.9 g | 91.5 g | +22.2% |
| Toplam Folat | 20 µg | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.3 g | 0.1 g | -66.7% |
| Toplam Şeker | 12.23 g | 5 g | -59.1% |
| Çinko | 0.15 mg | 0.07 mg | -53.3% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Kırmızı muz and Yeşil papaya.
Yeşil papaya has less energy per 100 g (32 kcal versus 90 kcal).
For measured C Vitamini (askorbik asit), Kırmızı muz has 8.7 mg and Yeşil papaya has 60.9 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Kırmızı muz 30, Yeşil papaya 47.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.