Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
14 kcal
Score
81 / 100
Kırmızı hindiba has a higher nutrition quality score (90) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
23 vs 14(-39.1%)
Score Diff
90 vs 81(-10.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kırmızı hindiba
Higher energy
Kırmızı hindiba
Score leader
Kırmızı hindiba
Nutrient split
15 - 4 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Kırmızı hindiba and Aysberg marul are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Kırmızı hindiba has 23.0 kcal and Aysberg marul has 14.0 kcal. The difference is 9.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 90 and 81. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Kırmızı hindiba | Aysberg marul | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 25 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.018 mg | 0.041 mg | +127.8% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.028 mg | 0.025 mg | -10.7% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.057 mg | 0.042 mg | -26.3% |
| Bakir | 0.341 mg | — | — |
| Beta Karoten | — | 299 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 8 mg | 2.8 mg | -65.0% |
| Demir | 0.57 mg | 0.41 mg | -28.1% |
| Diyet lifi | 0.9 g | 1.2 g | +33.3% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 2.26 mg | — | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 29 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 40 mg | 20 mg | -50.0% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 255.2 µg | 24.1 µg | -90.6% |
| Kalsiyum | 19 mg | 18 mg | -5.3% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 4.48 g | 2.97 g | -33.7% |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 8832 µg | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 13 mg | 7 mg | -46.2% |
| Mangan | 0.138 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | 0.255 mg | 0.123 mg | -51.8% |
| Pantotenik asit | 0.258 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 302 mg | 141 mg | -53.3% |
| Protein | 1.43 g | 0.9 g | -37.1% |
| Sodyum | 22 mg | 10 mg | -54.5% |
| Su | 93.14 g | 95.64 g | +2.7% |
| Toplam Folat | 60 µg | — | — |
| Toplam Kolin | 12.7 mg | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.25 g | 0.14 g | -44.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | 0.6 g | 1.97 g | +228.3% |
| Çinko | 0.62 mg | 0.15 mg | -75.8% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Kırmızı hindiba and Aysberg marul.
Aysberg marul has less energy per 100 g (14 kcal versus 23 kcal).
For measured Toplam Şeker, Kırmızı hindiba has 0.6 g and Aysberg marul has 1.97 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Kırmızı hindiba 90, Aysberg marul 81.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.