Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Kırmızı Brüksel lahanası has a higher nutrition quality score (83) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
43 vs 28(-34.9%)
Score Diff
83 vs 71(-14.5%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kırmızı Brüksel lahanası
Higher energy
Kırmızı Brüksel lahanası
Score leader
Kırmızı Brüksel lahanası
Nutrient split
19 - 2 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Kırmızı Brüksel lahanası and Afrika patlıcanı are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Kırmızı Brüksel lahanası has 43.0 kcal and Afrika patlıcanı has 28.0 kcal. The difference is 15.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 83 and 71. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
21 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Kırmızı Brüksel lahanası | Afrika patlıcanı | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 38 µg | 5 µg | -86.8% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.14 mg | 0.05 mg | -64.3% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.09 mg | 0.04 mg | -55.6% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.22 mg | 0.08 mg | -63.6% |
| Beta Karoten | 450 µg | 60 µg | -86.7% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 85 mg | 5 mg | -94.1% |
| Demir | 1.4 mg | 0.6 mg | -57.1% |
| Diyet lifi | 3.8 g | 2.5 g | -34.2% |
| Enerji | — | 117 kj | — |
| Folat DFE | 61 µg | 22 µg | -63.9% |
| Fosfor | 69 mg | 24 mg | -65.2% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 177 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 42 mg | 18 mg | -57.1% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 8.95 g | 5.9 g | -34.1% |
| Kül | 1.37 g | — | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 1590 µg | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 23 mg | 16 mg | -30.4% |
| Mangan | 0.33 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | 0.745 mg | 0.6 mg | -19.5% |
| Potasyum | 389 mg | 230 mg | -40.9% |
| Protein | 3.38 g | 1.2 g | -64.5% |
| Sodyum | 25 mg | 3 mg | -88.0% |
| Su | 86 g | 91.2 g | +6.0% |
| Toplam yağ | 0.3 g | 0.2 g | -33.3% |
| Toplam Şeker | 2.2 g | 2.8 g | +27.3% |
| Çinko | 0.42 mg | 0.17 mg | -59.5% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Kırmızı Brüksel lahanası and Afrika patlıcanı.
Afrika patlıcanı has less energy per 100 g (28 kcal versus 43 kcal).
For measured C Vitamini (askorbik asit), Kırmızı Brüksel lahanası has 85 mg and Afrika patlıcanı has 5 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Kırmızı Brüksel lahanası 83, Afrika patlıcanı 71.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.