Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
47 kcal
Score
22 / 100
Kireç Limonu (Lime) has a higher nutrition quality score (49) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
30 vs 47(+56.7%)
Score Diff
49 vs 22(-55.1%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kireç Limonu (Lime)
Higher energy
Akça armudu
Score leader
Kireç Limonu (Lime)
Nutrient split
8 - 4 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Kireç Limonu (Lime) and Akça armudu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Kireç Limonu (Lime) has 30.0 kcal and Akça armudu has 47.0 kcal. The difference is 17.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 49 and 22. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
13 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Kireç Limonu (Lime) | Akça armudu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 2 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.03 mg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.02 mg | — | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.043 mg | 0.028 mg | -34.9% |
| Bakir | 0.065 mg | 0.082 mg | +26.2% |
| Beta Karoten | — | 14 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 29.1 mg | 4.3 mg | -85.2% |
| Demir | 0.6 mg | 0.18 mg | -70.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 2.8 g | 2.8 g | 0.0% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 47 kcal | — |
| Fosfor | 18 mg | 11 mg | -38.9% |
| Fruktoz | — | 6.2 g | — |
| Glikoz | — | 2.8 g | — |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 4.4 µg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 33 mg | 9 mg | -72.7% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 10.54 g | 12.4 g | +17.6% |
| Magnezyum | 6 mg | 7 mg | +16.7% |
| Malik asit | — | 250 mg | — |
| Niasin | 0.2 mg | — | — |
| Pantotenik asit | 0.217 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 102 mg | 116 mg | +13.7% |
| Protein | 0.7 g | 0.38 g | -45.7% |
| Sakkaroz | — | 1.2 g | — |
| Sodyum | 2 mg | — | — |
| Su | 88.26 g | 85.5 g | -3.1% |
| Toplam Folat | 8 µg | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.2 g | 0.12 g | -40.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | 1.69 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 0.11 mg | — | — |
Scientific answers to key differences between Kireç Limonu (Lime) and Akça armudu.
Kireç Limonu (Lime) has less energy per 100 g (30 kcal versus 47 kcal).
For measured C Vitamini (askorbik asit), Kireç Limonu (Lime) has 29.1 mg and Akça armudu has 4.3 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Kireç Limonu (Lime) 49, Akça armudu 22.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.