Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
357.2 kcal
Score
20 / 100
Kinoa, Tohum, Çiğ has a higher nutrition quality score (32) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
368 vs 357.2(-2.9%)
Score Diff
32 vs 20(-37.5%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kinoa - Çiğ
Higher energy
Kinoa - Çiğ
Score leader
Kinoa - Çiğ
Nutrient split
15 - 4 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Kinoa, Tohum, Çiğ and Arpa Unu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Kinoa, Tohum, Çiğ has 368.0 kcal and Arpa Unu has 357.2 kcal. The difference is 10.8 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 32 and 20. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Kinoa - Çiğ | Arpa Unu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Azot | — | 1.5 g | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.36 mg | 0.23 mg | -36.1% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.318 mg | 0.15 mg | -52.8% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.487 mg | 0.2 mg | -58.9% |
| Bakir | 0.59 mg | 0.39 mg | -33.9% |
| Beta-glukan | — | 4.2 g | — |
| Biyotin | — | 8.61 µg | — |
| Demir | 4.57 mg | 3.3 mg | -27.8% |
| Diyet lifi | 7 g | 12.79 g | +82.7% |
| Düşük molekül ağırlıklı diyet lifi | — | 2.31 g | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 366.53 kcal | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Özel Faktörleri) | — | 357.19 kcal | — |
| Fosfor | 457 mg | 234.4 mg | -48.7% |
| Kalsiyum | 47 mg | 35.56 mg | -24.3% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 64.16 g | 77.4 g | +20.6% |
| Kül | 2.38 g | 1.53 g | -35.7% |
| Magnezyum | 197 mg | 88.04 mg | -55.3% |
| Mangan | 2.033 mg | 1.18 mg | -42.0% |
| Molibden | — | 57.36 µg | — |
| Niasin | 1.52 mg | 5.94 mg | +290.8% |
| Nisasta | — | 56.86 g | — |
| Potasyum | 563 mg | 366.6 mg | -34.9% |
| Protein | 14.12 g | 8.72 g | -38.2% |
| Selenyum | — | 13.1 µg | — |
| Sodyum | 5 mg | 20.33 mg | +306.6% |
| Su | 13.28 g | 9.9 g | -25.5% |
| Toplam Folat | 184 µg | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 6.07 g | 2.45 g | -59.6% |
| Total dietary fiber (AOAC 2011.25) | — | 16.15 g | — |
| Yüksek molekül ağırlıklı diyet lifi | — | 13.83 g | — |
| Çinko | 3.1 mg | 2.14 mg | -31.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Kinoa, Tohum, Çiğ and Arpa Unu.
Arpa Unu has less energy per 100 g (357.2 kcal versus 368 kcal).
For measured Sodyum, Kinoa - Çiğ has 5 mg and Arpa Unu has 20.33 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Kinoa - Çiğ 32, Arpa Unu 20.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.