Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
231 kcal
Score
0 / 100
Kereviz tuzu and Votka have the same nutrition score (0).
Energy Diff
118 vs 231(+95.8%)
Score Diff
0 vs 0
Higher energy
Votka
Score leader
Score is equal
Nutrient split
18 - 1 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Kereviz tuzu and Votka are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Kereviz tuzu has 118.0 kcal and Votka has 231.0 kcal. The difference is 113.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 0 and 0. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Kereviz tuzu | Votka | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 0 µg | — |
| Alfa Karoten | — | 0 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.1 mg | 0.01 mg | -90.0% |
| B12 Vitamini | — | 0 µg | — |
| B12 Vitamini (eklenmiş) | — | 0 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.11 mg | 0 mg | -100.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.07 mg | 0 mg | -100.0% |
| Bakir | 0.15 mg | 0.02 mg | -86.7% |
| Besin folati | — | 0 µg | — |
| Beta Karoten | — | 0 µg | — |
| Beta kriptoksantin | — | 0 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| D Vitamini | — | 0 µg | — |
| Demir | 13.5 mg | 0.04 mg | -99.7% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | — | 0 g | — |
| Diyet lifi | 3.6 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| DPA (22:5 n-3) | — | 0 g | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 0 mg | — |
| E Vitamini (eklenmiş) | — | 0 mg | — |
| Enerji | — | 231 kj | — |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | — | 0 g | — |
| Etil alkol | — | 33.4 g | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 0 µg | — |
| Folik asit | — | 0 µg | — |
| Fosfor | — | 4 mg | — |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 0 µg | — |
| Kafein | — | 0 mg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 372 mg | 0 mg | -100.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 12.3 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Kolesterol | — | 0 mg | — |
| Kül | 71 g | — | — |
| Likopen | — | 0 µg | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | — | 0 µg | — |
| Magnezyum | 132 mg | 0 mg | -100.0% |
| Mangan | 0.6 mg | — | — |
| MUFA 16:1 | — | 0 g | — |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | — | 0 g | — |
| MUFA 20:1 | — | 0 g | — |
| MUFA 22:1 | — | 0 g | — |
| Niasin | 0.9 mg | 0.01 mg | -98.9% |
| Potasyum | 420 mg | 2 mg | -99.5% |
| Protein | 5.4 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | — | 0 g | — |
| PUFA 18:3 | — | 0 g | — |
| PUFA 18:4 | — | 0 g | — |
| PUFA 20:4 (arasidonik asit) | — | 0 g | — |
| Retinol | — | 0 µg | — |
| Selenyum | — | 0 µg | — |
| SFA 10:0 | — | 0 g | — |
| SFA 12:0 | — | 0 g | — |
| SFA 14:0 | — | 0 g | — |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | — | 0 g | — |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | — | 0 g | — |
| SFA 4:0 (butirik asit) | — | 0 g | — |
| SFA 6:0 | — | 0 g | — |
| SFA 8:0 | — | 0 g | — |
| Sodyum | 28000 mg | 1 mg | -100.0% |
| Su | 3 g | 66.6 g | +2120.0% |
| Teobromin | — | 0 mg | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.2 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Toplam Folat | — | 0 µg | — |
| Toplam Kolin | — | 0 mg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 4.5 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Toplam yağ | 7.5 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.8 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 0 g | — |
| Çinko | 2 mg | 0.04 mg | -98.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Kereviz tuzu and Votka.
Kereviz tuzu has less energy per 100 g (118 kcal versus 231 kcal).
For measured Su, Kereviz tuzu has 3 g and Votka has 66.6 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Kereviz tuzu 0, Votka 0.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.