Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
97 kcal
Score
29 / 100
Muz, Çiğ has a higher nutrition quality score (29) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
118 vs 97(-17.8%)
Score Diff
0 vs 29(+100.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Muz, Çiğ
Higher energy
Kereviz tuzu
Score leader
Muz, Çiğ
Nutrient split
16 - 4 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Kereviz tuzu and Muz, Çiğ are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Kereviz tuzu has 118.0 kcal and Muz, Çiğ has 97.0 kcal. The difference is 21.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 0 and 29. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Kereviz tuzu | Muz, Çiğ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 1 µg | — |
| Alfa Karoten | — | 7 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.1 mg | 0.05 mg | -50.0% |
| B12 Vitamini | — | 0 µg | — |
| B12 Vitamini (eklenmiş) | — | 0 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.11 mg | 0 mg | -100.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.07 mg | 0.21 mg | +200.0% |
| Bakir | 0.15 mg | 0.1 mg | -33.3% |
| Besin folati | — | 15 µg | — |
| Beta Karoten | — | 8 µg | — |
| Beta kriptoksantin | — | 0 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 0 mg | 12 mg | — |
| D Vitamini | — | 0 µg | — |
| Demir | 13.5 mg | 0 mg | -100.0% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | — | 0 g | — |
| Diyet lifi | 3.6 g | 1.7 g | -52.8% |
| DPA (22:5 n-3) | — | 0 g | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 0.1 mg | — |
| E Vitamini (eklenmiş) | — | 0 mg | — |
| Enerji | — | 97 kj | — |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | — | 0 g | — |
| Etil alkol | — | 0 g | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 15 µg | — |
| Folik asit | — | 0 µg | — |
| Fosfor | — | 22 mg | — |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 0.1 µg | — |
| Kafein | — | 0 mg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 372 mg | 5 mg | -98.7% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 12.3 g | 22.71 g | +84.6% |
| Kolesterol | — | 0 mg | — |
| Kül | 71 g | — | — |
| Likopen | — | 0 µg | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | — | 22 µg | — |
| Magnezyum | 132 mg | 28 mg | -78.8% |
| Mangan | 0.6 mg | — | — |
| MUFA 16:1 | — | 0.01 g | — |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | — | 0.02 g | — |
| MUFA 20:1 | — | 0 g | — |
| MUFA 22:1 | — | 0 g | — |
| Niasin | 0.9 mg | 0.65 mg | -27.8% |
| Potasyum | 420 mg | 326 mg | -22.4% |
| Protein | 5.4 g | 0.74 g | -86.3% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | — | 0.05 g | — |
| PUFA 18:3 | — | 0.03 g | — |
| PUFA 18:4 | — | 0 g | — |
| PUFA 20:4 (arasidonik asit) | — | 0 g | — |
| Retinol | — | 0 µg | — |
| Selenyum | — | 0 µg | — |
| SFA 10:0 | — | 0 g | — |
| SFA 12:0 | — | 0 g | — |
| SFA 14:0 | — | 0 g | — |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | — | 0.1 g | — |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | — | 0.01 g | — |
| SFA 4:0 (butirik asit) | — | 0 g | — |
| SFA 6:0 | — | 0 g | — |
| SFA 8:0 | — | 0 g | — |
| Sodyum | 28000 mg | 0 mg | -100.0% |
| Su | 3 g | 75.6 g | +2420.0% |
| Teobromin | — | 0 mg | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.2 g | 0.11 g | -90.8% |
| Toplam Folat | — | 15 µg | — |
| Toplam Kolin | — | 9.8 mg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 4.5 g | 0.03 g | -99.3% |
| Toplam yağ | 7.5 g | 0.28 g | -96.3% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.8 g | 0.07 g | -96.1% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 15.8 g | — |
| Çinko | 2 mg | 0.16 mg | -92.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Kereviz tuzu and Muz, Çiğ.
Muz, Çiğ has less energy per 100 g (97 kcal versus 118 kcal).
For measured Su, Kereviz tuzu has 3 g and Muz, Çiğ has 75.6 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Kereviz tuzu 0, Muz, Çiğ 29.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.