Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
295 kcal
Score
9 / 100
Mastic sakızı has a higher nutrition quality score (9) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
118 vs 295(+150.0%)
Score Diff
0 vs 9(+100.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Mastic sakızı
Higher energy
Mastic sakızı
Score leader
Mastic sakızı
Nutrient split
14 - 3 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Kereviz tuzu and Mastic sakızı are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Kereviz tuzu has 118.0 kcal and Mastic sakızı has 295.0 kcal. The difference is 177.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 0 and 9. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
17 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Kereviz tuzu | Mastic sakızı | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.1 mg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.11 mg | — | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.07 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | 0.15 mg | 0.22 mg | +46.7% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 0 mg | — | — |
| Demir | 13.5 mg | 1.9 mg | -85.9% |
| Diyet lifi | 3.6 g | 78.5 g | +2080.6% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 1.2 mg | — |
| Enerji | — | 1234 kj | — |
| Fitosteroller | — | 45 mg | — |
| Fosfor | — | 22 mg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 372 mg | 65 mg | -82.5% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 12.3 g | 84.2 g | +584.6% |
| Kül | 71 g | 0.7 g | -99.0% |
| Magnezyum | 132 mg | 18 mg | -86.4% |
| Mangan | 0.6 mg | 0.45 mg | -25.0% |
| Niasin | 0.9 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 420 mg | 95 mg | -77.4% |
| Protein | 5.4 g | 1.1 g | -79.6% |
| Sodyum | 28000 mg | 12 mg | -100.0% |
| Su | 3 g | 2.2 g | -26.7% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.2 g | 0.4 g | -66.7% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 4.5 g | 0.8 g | -82.2% |
| Toplam yağ | 7.5 g | 1.8 g | -76.0% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.8 g | 0.3 g | -83.3% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 0.4 g | — |
| Çinko | 2 mg | 0.85 mg | -57.5% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Kereviz tuzu and Mastic sakızı.
Kereviz tuzu has less energy per 100 g (118 kcal versus 295 kcal).
For measured Diyet lifi, Kereviz tuzu has 3.6 g and Mastic sakızı has 78.5 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Kereviz tuzu 0, Mastic sakızı 9.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.