Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
68 kcal
Score
28 / 100
Kent mango has a higher nutrition quality score (33) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
60 vs 68(+13.3%)
Score Diff
33 vs 28(-15.2%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kent mango
Higher energy
Ahlat (Yaban Armudu)
Score leader
Kent mango
Nutrient split
10 - 11 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Kent mango and Ahlat (Yaban Armudu) are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Kent mango has 60.0 kcal and Ahlat (Yaban Armudu) has 68.0 kcal. The difference is 8.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 33 and 28. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
21 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Kent mango | Ahlat (Yaban Armudu) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 54 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.028 mg | 0.03 mg | +7.1% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.038 mg | 0.04 mg | +5.3% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.119 mg | 0.05 mg | -58.0% |
| Bakir | 0.111 mg | 0.08 mg | -27.9% |
| Beta Karoten | 640 µg | 35 µg | -94.5% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 36.4 mg | 7.5 mg | -79.4% |
| Demir | 0.16 mg | 0.5 mg | +212.5% |
| Diyet lifi | 1.6 g | 6.2 g | +287.5% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 0.9 mg | — | — |
| Folat DFE | 43 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 14 mg | 16 mg | +14.3% |
| Fruktoz | 4.68 g | — | — |
| Glikoz | 2.01 g | — | — |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 4.2 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 11 mg | 22 mg | +100.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 14.98 g | 17.5 g | +16.8% |
| Kül | 0.36 g | 0.6 g | +66.7% |
| Magnezyum | 10 mg | 11 mg | +10.0% |
| Niasin | 0.669 mg | 0.35 mg | -47.7% |
| Potasyum | 168 mg | 145 mg | -13.7% |
| Protein | 0.82 g | 0.6 g | -26.8% |
| Sakkaroz | 6.97 g | — | — |
| Sodyum | 1 mg | 2 mg | +100.0% |
| Su | 83.46 g | 79.5 g | -4.7% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 0.04 g | — |
| Toplam Folat | — | 8 µg | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.38 g | 0.3 g | -21.1% |
| Toplam Şeker | 13.66 g | 9.8 g | -28.3% |
| Çinko | 0.09 mg | 0.2 mg | +122.2% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Kent mango and Ahlat (Yaban Armudu).
Kent mango has less energy per 100 g (60 kcal versus 68 kcal).
For measured Diyet lifi, Kent mango has 1.6 g and Ahlat (Yaban Armudu) has 6.2 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Kent mango 33, Ahlat (Yaban Armudu) 28.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.