Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Kecap manis has a higher nutrition quality score (3) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
237 vs 310(+30.8%)
Score Diff
3 vs 0(-100.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kecap manis
Higher energy
Agave Şurubu (Mavi Agave)
Score leader
Kecap manis
Nutrient split
14 - 5 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Kecap manis and Agave Şurubu (Mavi Agave) are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Kecap manis has 237.0 kcal and Agave Şurubu (Mavi Agave) has 310.0 kcal. The difference is 73.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 3 and 0. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Kecap manis | Agave Şurubu (Mavi Agave) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.03 mg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.11 mg | — | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.08 mg | 0.014 mg | -82.5% |
| Bakir | 0.12 mg | 0.02 mg | -83.3% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 0 mg | — |
| Demir | 1.8 mg | 0.11 mg | -93.9% |
| Diyet lifi | 0.6 g | 0.2 g | -66.7% |
| Enerji | 992 kj | 1297 kj | +30.7% |
| Fosfor | 58 mg | 1 mg | -98.3% |
| Fruktoz | — | 55.6 g | — |
| Glikoz | — | 12.4 g | — |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 0.2 µg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 45 mg | 1 mg | -97.8% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 57.5 g | 76.37 g | +32.8% |
| Kül | 6.9 g | 0.09 g | -98.7% |
| Magnezyum | 28 mg | 1 mg | -96.4% |
| Mangan | 0.22 mg | 0.03 mg | -86.4% |
| Niasin | 1.4 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 310 mg | 4 mg | -98.7% |
| Protein | 3.8 g | 0.09 g | -97.6% |
| Sakkaroz | — | 0.1 g | — |
| Selenyum | — | 0.6 µg | — |
| Sodyum | 3820 mg | 4 mg | -99.9% |
| Su | 31 g | 23 g | -25.8% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.04 g | 0.05 g | +25.0% |
| Toplam Folat | 8 µg | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.2 g | 0.45 g | +125.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | 51.2 g | 68.1 g | +33.0% |
| Çinko | 0.45 mg | 0.05 mg | -88.9% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Kecap manis and Agave Şurubu (Mavi Agave).
Kecap manis has less energy per 100 g (237 kcal versus 310 kcal).
For measured Toplam yağ, Kecap manis has 0.2 g and Agave Şurubu (Mavi Agave) has 0.45 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Kecap manis 3, Agave Şurubu (Mavi Agave) 0.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.