Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Kaya Koruğu (Organik/Köy Usulü) has a higher nutrition quality score (89) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
28.8 vs 15(-47.9%)
Score Diff
89 vs 85(-4.5%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kaya Koruğu (Organik/Köy Usulü)
Higher energy
Kaya Koruğu (Organik/Köy Usulü)
Score leader
Kaya Koruğu (Organik/Köy Usulü)
Nutrient split
17 - 1 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Kaya Koruğu (Organik/Köy Usulü) and Acur are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Kaya Koruğu (Organik/Köy Usulü) has 28.8 kcal and Acur has 15.0 kcal. The difference is 13.8 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 89 and 85. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Kaya Koruğu (Organik/Köy Usulü) | Acur | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 15 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.05 mg | 0.027 mg | -46.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.08 mg | 0.033 mg | -58.8% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.1 mg | 0.04 mg | -60.0% |
| Bakir | — | 0.041 mg | — |
| Beta Karoten | 180 µg | 45 µg | -75.0% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 45 mg | 2.8 mg | -93.8% |
| Demir | 1.2 mg | 0.28 mg | -76.7% |
| Diyet lifi | 2.2 g | 0.5 g | -77.3% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 28.8 kcal | — | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 7 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 30 mg | 24 mg | -20.0% |
| İyot | 20 µg | — | — |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 16.4 µg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 110 mg | 16 mg | -85.5% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 4.5 g | 3.63 g | -19.3% |
| Kül | 3.1 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 40 mg | 13 mg | -67.5% |
| Mangan | 0.2 mg | 0.079 mg | -60.5% |
| Niasin | — | 0.098 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 450 mg | 147 mg | -67.3% |
| Protein | 1.8 g | 0.65 g | -63.9% |
| Sodyum | 250 mg | 2 mg | -99.2% |
| Su | 88 g | 95.23 g | +8.2% |
| Toplam yağ | 0.4 g | 0.11 g | -72.5% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 1.67 g | — |
| Çinko | 0.3 mg | 0.2 mg | -33.3% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Kaya Koruğu (Organik/Köy Usulü) and Acur.
Acur has less energy per 100 g (15 kcal versus 28.8 kcal).
For measured Sodyum, Kaya Koruğu (Organik/Köy Usulü) has 250 mg and Acur has 2 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Kaya Koruğu (Organik/Köy Usulü) 89, Acur 85.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.