Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
57 kcal
Score
19 / 100
Kara incir has a higher nutrition quality score (20) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
74 vs 57(-23.0%)
Score Diff
20 vs 19(-5.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kara incir
Higher energy
Kara incir
Score leader
Kara incir
Nutrient split
15 - 3 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Kara incir and Akça armut are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Kara incir has 74.0 kcal and Akça armut has 57.0 kcal. The difference is 17.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 20 and 19. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Kara incir | Akça armut | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.06 mg | 0.012 mg | -80.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.05 mg | 0.026 mg | -48.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.113 mg | 0.029 mg | -74.3% |
| Bakir | 0.07 mg | — | — |
| Beta Karoten | 85 µg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 2 mg | 4.3 mg | +115.0% |
| Demir | 0.37 mg | 0.18 mg | -51.4% |
| Diyet lifi | 2.9 g | 3.1 g | +6.9% |
| Folat DFE | — | 7 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 14 mg | 12 mg | -14.3% |
| Fruktoz | — | 6.22 g | — |
| Glikoz | — | 2.76 g | — |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 4.7 µg | 4.4 µg | -6.4% |
| Kalsiyum | 35 mg | 9 mg | -74.3% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 19.18 g | 15.2 g | -20.8% |
| Magnezyum | 17 mg | 7 mg | -58.8% |
| Mangan | 0.128 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | 0.4 mg | 0.161 mg | -59.8% |
| Potasyum | 232 mg | 116 mg | -50.0% |
| Protein | 0.75 g | 0.36 g | -52.0% |
| Sakkaroz | — | 0.77 g | — |
| Sodyum | 1 mg | 1 mg | 0.0% |
| Su | 79.11 g | 83.8 g | +5.9% |
| Toplam yağ | 0.3 g | 0.14 g | -53.3% |
| Toplam Şeker | 16.26 g | 9.75 g | -40.0% |
| Çinko | 0.15 mg | 0.1 mg | -33.3% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Kara incir and Akça armut.
Akça armut has less energy per 100 g (57 kcal versus 74 kcal).
For measured C Vitamini (askorbik asit), Kara incir has 2 mg and Akça armut has 4.3 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Kara incir 20, Akça armut 19.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.