Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
357.2 kcal
Score
20 / 100
Kaniwa (Çiğ) has a higher nutrition quality score (55) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
343 vs 357.2(+4.1%)
Score Diff
55 vs 20(-63.6%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kaniwa (Çiğ)
Higher energy
Arpa Unu
Score leader
Kaniwa (Çiğ)
Nutrient split
14 - 5 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Kaniwa (Çiğ) and Arpa Unu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Kaniwa (Çiğ) has 343.0 kcal and Arpa Unu has 357.2 kcal. The difference is 14.2 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 55 and 20. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Kaniwa (Çiğ) | Arpa Unu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Azot | — | 1.5 g | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.58 mg | 0.23 mg | -60.3% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.49 mg | 0.15 mg | -69.4% |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0.2 mg | — |
| Bakir | 0.82 mg | 0.39 mg | -52.4% |
| Beta-glukan | — | 4.2 g | — |
| Biyotin | — | 8.61 µg | — |
| Demir | 12.5 mg | 3.3 mg | -73.6% |
| Diyet lifi | 9.8 g | 12.79 g | +30.5% |
| Düşük molekül ağırlıklı diyet lifi | — | 2.31 g | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 343 kcal | 366.53 kcal | +6.9% |
| Enerji (Atwater Özel Faktörleri) | — | 357.19 kcal | — |
| Folat DFE | 182 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 405 mg | 234.4 mg | -42.1% |
| Kalsiyum | 110 mg | 35.56 mg | -67.7% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 66 g | 77.4 g | +17.3% |
| Kül | 2.4 g | 1.53 g | -36.3% |
| Magnezyum | 215 mg | 88.04 mg | -59.1% |
| Mangan | 2.2 mg | 1.18 mg | -46.4% |
| Molibden | — | 57.36 µg | — |
| Niasin | 1.45 mg | 5.94 mg | +309.7% |
| Nisasta | — | 56.86 g | — |
| Potasyum | 610 mg | 366.6 mg | -39.9% |
| Protein | 15.1 g | 8.72 g | -42.3% |
| Selenyum | — | 13.1 µg | — |
| Sodyum | 5 mg | 20.33 mg | +306.6% |
| Su | 10.3 g | 9.9 g | -3.9% |
| Toplam yağ | 6.2 g | 2.45 g | -60.5% |
| Total dietary fiber (AOAC 2011.25) | — | 16.15 g | — |
| Yüksek molekül ağırlıklı diyet lifi | — | 13.83 g | — |
| Çinko | 4.6 mg | 2.14 mg | -53.5% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Kaniwa (Çiğ) and Arpa Unu.
Kaniwa (Çiğ) has less energy per 100 g (343 kcal versus 357.2 kcal).
For measured Niasin, Kaniwa (Çiğ) has 1.45 mg and Arpa Unu has 5.94 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Kaniwa (Çiğ) 55, Arpa Unu 20.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.