Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
357 kcal
Score
1 / 100
Kamut buğdayı has a higher nutrition quality score (29) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
337 vs 357(+5.9%)
Score Diff
29 vs 1(-96.6%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kamut buğdayı
Higher energy
Ararot nişastası
Score leader
Kamut buğdayı
Nutrient split
16 - 2 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Kamut buğdayı and Ararot nişastası are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Kamut buğdayı has 337.0 kcal and Ararot nişastası has 357.0 kcal. The difference is 20.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 29 and 1. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Kamut buğdayı | Ararot nişastası | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Azot | 2.35 g | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.4 mg | 0.013 mg | -96.8% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.1 mg | 0.005 mg | -95.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.2 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | 0.38 mg | 0.121 mg | -68.2% |
| Demir | 4.5 mg | 0.33 mg | -92.7% |
| Diyet lifi | 9.1 g | 3.4 g | -62.6% |
| Folat DFE | 46 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 401 mg | 5 mg | -98.8% |
| Kalsiyum | 33 mg | 40 mg | +21.2% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | — | 88.15 g | — |
| Karbonhidrat (toplamla) | 70.3 g | — | — |
| Kül | — | 0.14 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 130 mg | 3 mg | -97.7% |
| Mangan | 2.5 mg | 0.116 mg | -95.4% |
| Niasin | 6 mg | 0.082 mg | -98.6% |
| Nisasta | — | 84.75 g | — |
| Potasyum | 440 mg | 11 mg | -97.5% |
| Protein | 14.7 g | 0.32 g | -97.8% |
| Selenyum | 85 µg | 0.7 µg | -99.2% |
| Sodyum | — | 21 mg | — |
| Su | 10 g | 11.32 g | +13.2% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.3 g | 0.015 g | -95.0% |
| Toplam Folat | — | 7 µg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.4 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 2.2 g | 0.07 g | -96.8% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.1 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 1 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Çinko | 3.1 mg | 0.06 mg | -98.1% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Kamut buğdayı and Ararot nişastası.
Kamut buğdayı has less energy per 100 g (337 kcal versus 357 kcal).
For measured Toplam Şeker, Kamut buğdayı has 1 g and Ararot nişastası has 0 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Kamut buğdayı 29, Ararot nişastası 1.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.