Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
579 kcal
Score
23 / 100
Kaju Fıstığı has a higher nutrition quality score (33) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
553 vs 579(+4.7%)
Score Diff
33 vs 23(-30.3%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kaju Fıstığı
Higher energy
Badem (Kavrulmamış)
Score leader
Kaju Fıstığı
Nutrient split
11 - 9 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Kaju Fıstığı and Badem (Kavrulmamış) are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Kaju Fıstığı has 553.0 kcal and Badem (Kavrulmamış) has 579.0 kcal. The difference is 26.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 33 and 23. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Kaju Fıstığı | Badem (Kavrulmamış) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.423 mg | 0.205 mg | -51.5% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 1.138 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.417 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | 2.195 mg | 1.031 mg | -53.0% |
| Demir | 6.68 mg | 3.71 mg | -44.5% |
| Diyet lifi | 3.3 g | 12.5 g | +278.8% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 25.63 mg | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Özel Faktörleri) | 553 kcal | — | — |
| Folat DFE | 25 µg | 44 µg | +76.0% |
| Fosfor | 593 mg | 481 mg | -18.9% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 34.1 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 37 mg | 269 mg | +627.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 30.19 g | 21.55 g | -28.6% |
| Magnezyum | 292 mg | 270 mg | -7.5% |
| Mangan | 1.655 mg | 2.179 mg | +31.7% |
| Niasin | — | 3.618 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 660 mg | 733 mg | +11.1% |
| Protein | 18.22 g | 21.15 g | +16.1% |
| Selenyum | 19.9 µg | — | — |
| Sodyum | 12 mg | 1 mg | -91.7% |
| Su | 5.2 g | 4.41 g | -15.2% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 7.78 g | 3.802 g | -51.1% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 23.8 g | 31.551 g | +32.6% |
| Toplam yağ | 43.85 g | 49.93 g | +13.9% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 7.85 g | 12.329 g | +57.1% |
| Toplam Şeker | 5.91 g | 4.35 g | -26.4% |
| Çinko | 5.78 mg | 3.12 mg | -46.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Kaju Fıstığı and Badem (Kavrulmamış).
Kaju Fıstığı has less energy per 100 g (553 kcal versus 579 kcal).
For measured Kalsiyum, Kaju Fıstığı has 37 mg and Badem (Kavrulmamış) has 269 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Kaju Fıstığı 33, Badem (Kavrulmamış) 23.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.