Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Kahverengi mercimek has a higher nutrition quality score (30) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
353 vs 357(+1.1%)
Score Diff
30 vs 1(-96.7%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kahverengi mercimek
Higher energy
Ararot nişastası
Score leader
Kahverengi mercimek
Nutrient split
14 - 4 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Kahverengi mercimek and Ararot nişastası are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Kahverengi mercimek has 353.0 kcal and Ararot nişastası has 357.0 kcal. The difference is 4.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 30 and 1. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Kahverengi mercimek | Ararot nişastası | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.87 mg | 0.013 mg | -98.5% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.21 mg | 0.005 mg | -97.6% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.54 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | 0.5 mg | 0.121 mg | -75.8% |
| Demir | 7.5 mg | 0.33 mg | -95.6% |
| Diyet lifi | 10.7 g | 3.4 g | -68.2% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 353 kcal | — | — |
| Folat DFE | 479 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 281 mg | 5 mg | -98.2% |
| Kalsiyum | 35 mg | 40 mg | +14.3% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 60.1 g | 88.15 g | +46.7% |
| Kül | — | 0.14 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 47 mg | 3 mg | -93.6% |
| Mangan | 1.3 mg | 0.116 mg | -91.1% |
| Niasin | 2.6 mg | 0.082 mg | -96.8% |
| Nisasta | — | 84.75 g | — |
| Pantotenik asit | 2.1 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 677 mg | 11 mg | -98.4% |
| Protein | 24.6 g | 0.32 g | -98.7% |
| Selenyum | 46 µg | 0.7 µg | -98.5% |
| Sodyum | 6 mg | 21 mg | +250.0% |
| Su | 10.4 g | 11.32 g | +8.8% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 0.015 g | — |
| Toplam Folat | — | 7 µg | — |
| Toplam yağ | 1.1 g | 0.07 g | -93.6% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 0 g | — |
| Çinko | 3.3 mg | 0.06 mg | -98.2% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Kahverengi mercimek and Ararot nişastası.
Kahverengi mercimek has less energy per 100 g (353 kcal versus 357 kcal).
For measured Sodyum, Kahverengi mercimek has 6 mg and Ararot nişastası has 21 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Kahverengi mercimek 30, Ararot nişastası 1.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.