Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
368 kcal
Score
32 / 100
Altın kinoa has a higher nutrition quality score (32) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
353 vs 368(+4.3%)
Score Diff
30 vs 32(+6.7%)
OVERALL WINNER
Altın kinoa
Higher energy
Altın kinoa
Score leader
Altın kinoa
Nutrient split
10 - 10 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Kahverengi mercimek and Altın kinoa are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Kahverengi mercimek has 353.0 kcal and Altın kinoa has 368.0 kcal. The difference is 15.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 30 and 32. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Kahverengi mercimek | Altın kinoa | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.87 mg | 0.36 mg | -58.6% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.21 mg | 0.32 mg | +52.4% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.54 mg | 0.49 mg | -9.3% |
| Bakir | 0.5 mg | 0.59 mg | +18.0% |
| Demir | 7.5 mg | 4.57 mg | -39.1% |
| Diyet lifi | 10.7 g | 7 g | -34.6% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 2.44 mg | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 353 kcal | 368 kcal | +4.2% |
| Folat DFE | 479 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 281 mg | 457 mg | +62.6% |
| Kalsiyum | 35 mg | 47 mg | +34.3% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 60.1 g | 64.16 g | +6.8% |
| Magnezyum | 47 mg | 197 mg | +319.1% |
| Mangan | 1.3 mg | 2 mg | +53.8% |
| Niasin | 2.6 mg | 1.52 mg | -41.5% |
| Pantotenik asit | 2.1 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 677 mg | 563 mg | -16.8% |
| Protein | 24.6 g | 14.12 g | -42.6% |
| Selenyum | 46 µg | 8.5 µg | -81.5% |
| Sodyum | 6 mg | 5 mg | -16.7% |
| Su | 10.4 g | 13.28 g | +27.7% |
| Toplam Folat | — | 184 µg | — |
| Toplam yağ | 1.1 g | 6.07 g | +451.8% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 0.1 g | — |
| Çinko | 3.3 mg | 3.1 mg | -6.1% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Kahverengi mercimek and Altın kinoa.
Kahverengi mercimek has less energy per 100 g (353 kcal versus 368 kcal).
For measured Toplam yağ, Kahverengi mercimek has 1.1 g and Altın kinoa has 6.07 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Kahverengi mercimek 30, Altın kinoa 32.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.