Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
14 kcal
Score
81 / 100
Kabak çiçeği has a higher nutrition quality score (100) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
15 vs 14(-6.7%)
Score Diff
100 vs 81(-19.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kabak çiçeği
Higher energy
Kabak çiçeği
Score leader
Kabak çiçeği
Nutrient split
15 - 5 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Kabak çiçeği and Aysberg marul are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Kabak çiçeği has 15.0 kcal and Aysberg marul has 14.0 kcal. The difference is 1.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 100 and 81. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Kabak çiçeği | Aysberg marul | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 97 µg | 25 µg | -74.2% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.042 mg | 0.041 mg | -2.4% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.075 mg | 0.025 mg | -66.7% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.05 mg | 0.042 mg | -16.0% |
| Bakir | 0.063 mg | — | — |
| Beta Karoten | 1164 µg | 299 µg | -74.3% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 28 mg | 2.8 mg | -90.0% |
| Demir | 0.7 mg | 0.41 mg | -41.4% |
| Diyet lifi | 1 g | 1.2 g | +20.0% |
| Folat DFE | — | 29 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 49 mg | 20 mg | -59.2% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 24.1 µg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 39 mg | 18 mg | -53.8% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 3.28 g | 2.97 g | -9.5% |
| Kül | 0.47 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 24 mg | 7 mg | -70.8% |
| Mangan | 0.11 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | 0.69 mg | 0.123 mg | -82.2% |
| Potasyum | 173 mg | 141 mg | -18.5% |
| Protein | 1.03 g | 0.9 g | -12.6% |
| Sodyum | 5 mg | 10 mg | +100.0% |
| Su | 95.15 g | 95.64 g | +0.5% |
| Toplam Folat | 59 µg | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.07 g | 0.14 g | +100.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | 1.8 g | 1.97 g | +9.4% |
| Çinko | 0.58 mg | 0.15 mg | -74.1% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Kabak çiçeği and Aysberg marul.
Aysberg marul has less energy per 100 g (14 kcal versus 15 kcal).
For measured Sodyum, Kabak çiçeği has 5 mg and Aysberg marul has 10 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Kabak çiçeği 100, Aysberg marul 81.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.