Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
65 kcal
Score
31 / 100
Jabuticaba has a higher nutrition quality score (42) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
45 vs 65(+44.4%)
Score Diff
42 vs 31(-26.2%)
OVERALL WINNER
Jabuticaba
Higher energy
Alphonso mango
Score leader
Jabuticaba
Nutrient split
2 - 13 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Jabuticaba and Alphonso mango are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Jabuticaba has 45.0 kcal and Alphonso mango has 65.0 kcal. The difference is 20.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 42 and 31. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
15 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Jabuticaba | Alphonso mango | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 2 µg | 54 µg | +2600.0% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.02 mg | 0.028 mg | +40.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.02 mg | 0.038 mg | +90.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0.119 mg | — |
| Bakir | 0.05 mg | 0.111 mg | +122.0% |
| Beta Karoten | — | 640 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 22.7 mg | 36.4 mg | +60.4% |
| Demir | 0.5 mg | 0.16 mg | -68.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 0.8 g | 1.6 g | +100.0% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 0.9 mg | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 43 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 9.2 mg | — | — |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 4.2 µg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 6.3 mg | 11 mg | +74.6% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 12.6 g | 15 g | +19.0% |
| Kül | 0.4 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 11 mg | 10 mg | -9.1% |
| Mangan | 0.1 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | 0.25 mg | 0.669 mg | +167.6% |
| Pantotenik asit | — | 0.197 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 135 mg | 168 mg | +24.4% |
| Protein | 0.6 g | 0.82 g | +36.7% |
| Su | 85.8 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.3 g | 0.38 g | +26.7% |
| Toplam Şeker | 10.4 g | 13.7 g | +31.7% |
| Çinko | 0.12 mg | — | — |
Scientific answers to key differences between Jabuticaba and Alphonso mango.
Jabuticaba has less energy per 100 g (45 kcal versus 65 kcal).
For measured A Vitamini (RAE), Jabuticaba has 2 µg and Alphonso mango has 54 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Jabuticaba 42, Alphonso mango 31.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.