Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
İstiridye Mantarı (Kavak) has a higher nutrition quality score (93) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
33 vs 204(+518.2%)
Score Diff
93 vs 80(-14.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
İstiridye Mantarı (Kavak)
Higher energy
Chaga Mantarı
Score leader
İstiridye Mantarı (Kavak)
Nutrient split
4 - 17 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
İstiridye Mantarı (Kavak) and Chaga Mantarı are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, İstiridye Mantarı (Kavak) has 33.0 kcal and Chaga Mantarı has 204.0 kcal. The difference is 171.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 93 and 80. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
22 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | İstiridye Mantarı (Kavak) | Chaga Mantarı | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.125 mg | 0.18 mg | +44.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.349 mg | 0.52 mg | +49.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.11 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | 0.244 mg | 0.94 mg | +285.2% |
| Beta-glukan | 0.48 g | 16.8 g | +3400.0% |
| D Vitamini | 0.7 µg | — | — |
| D2 Vitamini (ergokalsiferol) | — | 4.8 µg | — |
| Demir | 1.33 mg | 12.4 mg | +832.3% |
| Diyet lifi | 2.3 g | 56.2 g | +2343.5% |
| Ergosterol | — | 340 mg | — |
| Folat DFE | 38 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 120 mg | 92 mg | -23.3% |
| Kalsiyum | 18 mg | 195 mg | +983.3% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 6.09 g | 68.4 g | +1023.2% |
| Kül | 1.01 g | 8.1 g | +702.0% |
| Magnezyum | 18 mg | 135 mg | +650.0% |
| Mangan | 0.113 mg | 15.6 mg | +13705.3% |
| Niasin | 4.96 mg | 5.4 mg | +8.9% |
| Pantotenik asit | 1.29 mg | 1.2 mg | -7.0% |
| Potasyum | 420 mg | 2840 mg | +576.2% |
| Protein | 3.31 g | 3.9 g | +17.8% |
| Selenyum | 2.6 µg | 14.5 µg | +457.7% |
| Sodyum | 18 mg | 18 mg | 0.0% |
| Su | 89.18 g | 10.2 g | -88.6% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 0.35 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.41 g | 1.3 g | +217.1% |
| Toplam Şeker | 1.11 g | 0.6 g | -45.9% |
| Çinko | 0.77 mg | 6.8 mg | +783.1% |
Scientific answers to key differences between İstiridye Mantarı (Kavak) and Chaga Mantarı.
İstiridye Mantarı (Kavak) has less energy per 100 g (33 kcal versus 204 kcal).
For measured Mangan, İstiridye Mantarı (Kavak) has 0.113 mg and Chaga Mantarı has 15.6 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: İstiridye Mantarı (Kavak) 93, Chaga Mantarı 80.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.