Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
324.2 kcal
Score
55 / 100
Isırgan tohumu has a higher nutrition quality score (56) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
437 vs 324.2(-25.8%)
Score Diff
56 vs 55(-1.8%)
OVERALL WINNER
Isırgan tohumu
Higher energy
Isırgan tohumu
Score leader
Isırgan tohumu
Nutrient split
12 - 4 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Isırgan tohumu and Amchur are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Isırgan tohumu has 437.0 kcal and Amchur has 324.2 kcal. The difference is 112.8 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 56 and 55. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
16 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Isırgan tohumu | Amchur | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 22 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.45 mg | 0.08 mg | -82.2% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.32 mg | 0.09 mg | -71.9% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.28 mg | 0.22 mg | -21.4% |
| Bakir | — | 0.35 mg | — |
| Beta Karoten | — | 260 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 15 mg | 52 mg | +246.7% |
| Demir | 12.8 mg | 24.5 mg | +91.4% |
| Diyet lifi | 14.5 g | 12.8 g | -11.7% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 7.5 mg | — | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 28 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 680 mg | 75 mg | -89.0% |
| Kalsiyum | 1150 mg | 180 mg | -84.3% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 34.8 g | 80.2 g | +130.5% |
| Kül | 6.9 g | 5.3 g | -23.2% |
| Magnezyum | 420 mg | 82 mg | -80.5% |
| Mangan | 2.8 mg | — | — |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 3.8 g | — | — |
| Niasin | — | 1.4 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 850 mg | 640 mg | -24.7% |
| Protein | 18.2 g | 3.2 g | -82.4% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | 18.5 g | — | — |
| PUFA 18:3 | 0.9 g | — | — |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | 2.1 g | — | — |
| Sodyum | — | 35 mg | — |
| Su | 7.2 g | 9.5 g | +31.9% |
| Toplam yağ | 25.4 g | 1.8 g | -92.9% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 21.4 g | — |
| Çinko | 4.2 mg | 1.1 mg | -73.8% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Isırgan tohumu and Amchur.
Amchur has less energy per 100 g (324.2 kcal versus 437 kcal).
For measured C Vitamini (askorbik asit), Isırgan tohumu has 15 mg and Amchur has 52 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Isırgan tohumu 56, Amchur 55.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.