Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
315 kcal
Score
76 / 100
Adaçayı (Kuru) has a higher nutrition quality score (76) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
328.5 vs 315(-4.1%)
Score Diff
73 vs 76(+4.1%)
OVERALL WINNER
Adaçayı (Kuru)
Higher energy
İpek Maraş Pul Biberi
Score leader
Adaçayı (Kuru)
Nutrient split
15 - 10 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
İpek Maraş Pul Biberi and Adaçayı (Kuru) are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, İpek Maraş Pul Biberi has 328.5 kcal and Adaçayı (Kuru) has 315.0 kcal. The difference is 13.5 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 73 and 76. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
25 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | İpek Maraş Pul Biberi | Adaçayı (Kuru) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 1980 µg | 295 µg | -85.1% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.32 mg | 0.75 mg | +134.4% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.95 mg | 0.34 mg | -64.2% |
| B6 Vitamini | 2.15 mg | 2.69 mg | +25.1% |
| Beta Karoten | 23760 µg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 76.4 mg | 31.4 mg | -58.9% |
| Demir | 14.2 mg | 28.12 mg | +98.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 27.2 g | 40.3 g | +48.2% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 29.8 mg | 7.48 mg | -74.9% |
| Folat DFE | 53 µg | 274 µg | +417.0% |
| Fosfor | 290 mg | 91 mg | -68.6% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 1714 µg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 145 mg | 1652 mg | +1039.3% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 49.5 g | 60.73 g | +22.7% |
| Kül | 9.2 g | 7.93 g | -13.8% |
| Magnezyum | 148 mg | 428 mg | +189.2% |
| Mangan | — | 3.13 mg | — |
| Niasin | 8.7 mg | 5.72 mg | -34.3% |
| Potasyum | 1980 mg | 1070 mg | -46.0% |
| Protein | 12.3 g | 10.63 g | -13.6% |
| Sodyum | 1820 mg | 11 mg | -99.4% |
| Su | 14.2 g | 7.96 g | -43.9% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 2.4 g | 7.01 g | +192.1% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 4.1 g | 1.87 g | -54.4% |
| Toplam yağ | 14.8 g | 12.75 g | -13.9% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 7.3 g | 1.76 g | -75.9% |
| Toplam Şeker | 8.1 g | 1.71 g | -78.9% |
| Çinko | 2.65 mg | 4.7 mg | +77.4% |
Scientific answers to key differences between İpek Maraş Pul Biberi and Adaçayı (Kuru).
Adaçayı (Kuru) has less energy per 100 g (315 kcal versus 328.5 kcal).
For measured Kalsiyum, İpek Maraş Pul Biberi has 145 mg and Adaçayı (Kuru) has 1652 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: İpek Maraş Pul Biberi 73, Adaçayı (Kuru) 76.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.