Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
1 kcal
Score
100 / 100
Adaçayı (Tıbbi) has a higher nutrition quality score (100) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
268 vs 1(-99.6%)
Score Diff
61 vs 100(+63.9%)
OVERALL WINNER
Adaçayı (Tıbbi)
Higher energy
Ihlamur Çiçeği
Score leader
Adaçayı (Tıbbi)
Nutrient split
19 - 1 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Ihlamur Çiçeği and Adaçayı (Tıbbi) are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Ihlamur Çiçeği has 268.0 kcal and Adaçayı (Tıbbi) has 1.0 kcal. The difference is 267.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 61 and 100. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Ihlamur Çiçeği | Adaçayı (Tıbbi) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.18 mg | 0.004 mg | -97.8% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.35 mg | 0.008 mg | -97.7% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.22 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | 0.72 mg | 0.01 mg | -98.6% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 24 mg | 0.2 mg | -99.2% |
| Demir | 10.5 mg | 0.08 mg | -99.2% |
| Diyet lifi | 39.5 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 1 kcal | — |
| Fosfor | 140 mg | 1 mg | -99.3% |
| Kafein | — | 0 mg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 620 mg | 3 mg | -99.5% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 66.2 g | 0.2 g | -99.7% |
| Kül | 6 g | 0.1 g | -98.3% |
| Magnezyum | 135 mg | 2 mg | -98.5% |
| Mangan | 4.8 mg | 0.08 mg | -98.3% |
| Niasin | 1.45 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 950 mg | 14 mg | -98.5% |
| Protein | 7.4 g | 0.1 g | -98.6% |
| Sodyum | 15 mg | 1 mg | -93.3% |
| Su | 9.8 g | 99.6 g | +916.3% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.65 g | — | — |
| Toplam Folat | 45 µg | 1 µg | -97.8% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.42 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 2.6 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.15 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 4.8 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Çinko | 2.1 mg | 0.03 mg | -98.6% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Ihlamur Çiçeği and Adaçayı (Tıbbi).
Adaçayı (Tıbbi) has less energy per 100 g (1 kcal versus 268 kcal).
For measured Su, Ihlamur Çiçeği has 9.8 g and Adaçayı (Tıbbi) has 99.6 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Ihlamur Çiçeği 61, Adaçayı (Tıbbi) 100.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.